2013
DOI: 10.1007/s13198-013-0151-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent trend in condition monitoring for equipment fault diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4. Early, close proximity, pairings are common with (18,19), (1,10), (5,11), (9,24) and (14,15), the latter two pairs also quickly forming a homogeneous set along with harmonic 12. Pressure envelope harmonic features could be considered as 5 early formed groups (T < 0.2) or 2 groups (T < 0.35).…”
Section: Input Parameter Peductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4. Early, close proximity, pairings are common with (18,19), (1,10), (5,11), (9,24) and (14,15), the latter two pairs also quickly forming a homogeneous set along with harmonic 12. Pressure envelope harmonic features could be considered as 5 early formed groups (T < 0.2) or 2 groups (T < 0.35).…”
Section: Input Parameter Peductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Condition monitoring (CM) is concerned with preventing, or at the very least predicting, impending component failure. Modern process monitoring is complemented with maintenance on demand, maintenance based on real time observations of operations with respect to expected normal behaviour [1,2] . With increasing pressure on excellence of process performance and product quality, CM becomes ever more vital.…”
Section: Problem Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of measuring transducers on the acoustic signatures based on AEM has been analyzed by (Faria, Costa, & Olivas, 2015) and the possibility of using AEM for testing of OLTCs during normal operation has been presented by (Cichoń & Borucki, 2012). A review of monitoring methods used in power transformers for predictive maintenance has been presented by (Bhattacharya & Dan, 2014) and recent trends of condition monitoring for fault diagnosis of equipment has been reviewed by (Wang et al, 2015). Fuzzy logic based autodiagnosis of OLTCs has been suggested by (Henriquez & Alonso, 2014;Hu, Duan, & Yong, 2015).…”
Section: Literature Review and Novelty Of Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%