1977
DOI: 10.1351/pac197749070929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent trends in classical light scattering from polymer solutions

Abstract: -Extension of usable wavelengths to the near i.r. by means of laser sources enables the molecular weights and dimensions to be measured for exceptionally large macromolecules and bacteria. Comparisons have been made between experimental and theoretically predicted behaviour of solutions subjected to external constraints such as temperature, applied pressure and hydrodynamic shear. Scission and molecular motion can be analysed via light scattering in polymers subjected to laser or pulse degradation; kinetics of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Any refractive index difference, Δn, between the two solutions contributes to the optical path length so that: ΔY = Δnl/λ, where l is the optical path length and λ is the wavelength of the light source (Richards and Schachman, 1959;Yphantis, 1964). For a non-dialyzable solution component, the refractive index difference is proportional to the refractive index increment: Δn = c(dn/dc) and the extinction coefficient e is replaced by (6) For proteins, dn/dc is relatively independent of composition with an average value of 0.186 ml/g (Huglin, 1972). For the XLA λ = ~670 nm and the sample pathlength is 1.2 cm, so that a 1 mg/ml sample results in a fringe displacement of ~3.25 fringes (Laue, 1996).…”
Section: B Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any refractive index difference, Δn, between the two solutions contributes to the optical path length so that: ΔY = Δnl/λ, where l is the optical path length and λ is the wavelength of the light source (Richards and Schachman, 1959;Yphantis, 1964). For a non-dialyzable solution component, the refractive index difference is proportional to the refractive index increment: Δn = c(dn/dc) and the extinction coefficient e is replaced by (6) For proteins, dn/dc is relatively independent of composition with an average value of 0.186 ml/g (Huglin, 1972). For the XLA λ = ~670 nm and the sample pathlength is 1.2 cm, so that a 1 mg/ml sample results in a fringe displacement of ~3.25 fringes (Laue, 1996).…”
Section: B Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The angular dependence of scattering was determined at 10Њ intervals between 30Њ and 150Њ. A value of 0.146 ml/g was employed as the refrective index increment, dn/dc (Pascall & Foster, 1952;Huglin, 1972) for amylose and a value of 0.142 ml/g was employed for amylopectin (French, 1984). The actual concentration for all the samples was determined using the phenol-sulphuric acid assay (Dubois et al, 1956).…”
Section: Light Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The normalization of the detectors in the different aqueous solutions was performed with low molecular weight, standard samples of poly(ethylene oxide) and dextran. This detector simultaneously measures the excess Rayleigh ratio at different angles (thirteen different angle values, ranging from 21 to 159 degrees were used) and allows calculating the molecular weight, M , and the mean square radius of gyration, <s 2 >, for each slice across a sample peak of the size exclusion chromatogram according to the basic equation [6,41] …”
Section: Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%