Recent Trends in Decellularized Extracellular Matrix Bioinks for 3D Printing: An Updated Review

Abstract

The promise of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering is founded on the ability to regenerate diseased or damaged tissues and organs into functional tissues and organs or the creation of new tissues and organs altogether. In theory, damaged and diseased tissues and organs can be regenerated or created using different configurations and combinations of extracellular matrix (ECM), cells, and inductive biomolecules. Regenerative medicine and tissue engineering can allow the improvement of patients’ quality of life through availing novel treatment options. The coupling of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering with 3D printing, big data, and computational algorithms is revolutionizing the treatment of patients in a huge way. 3D bioprinting allows the proper placement of cells and ECMs, allowing the recapitulation of native microenvironments of tissues and organs. 3D bioprinting utilizes different bioinks made up of different formulations of ECM/biomaterials, biomolecules, and even cells. The choice of the bioink used during 3D bioprinting is very important as properties such as printability, compatibility, and physical strength influence the final construct printed. The extracellular matrix (ECM) provides both physical and mechanical microenvironment needed by cells to survive and proliferate. Decellularized ECM bioink contains biochemical cues from the original native ECM and also the right proportions of ECM proteins. Different techniques and characterization methods are used to derive bioinks from several tissues and organs and to evaluate their quality. This review discusses the uses of decellularized ECM bioinks and argues that they represent the most biomimetic bioinks available. In addition, we briefly discuss some polymer-based bioinks utilized in 3D bioprinting.

New Nanotechnologies for the Treatment and Repair of Skin Burns Infections

“…Combining tissue engineering, regenerative medicine and 3D printing (by placing cells and extracellular matrix in tissue native microenvironments) with big data analysis is offering new perspectives in the treatment of burn wound patients [101].…”

Information-Driven Design as a Potential Approach for 3D Printing of Skeletal Muscle Biomimetic Scaffolds

“…Thus, dealing with bioinks made of only dECM, providing cells with their natural microenvironment, could represent a further step towards the design of a real tissue-mimicking scaffold. In this context, dECM bioinks have been derived from different organs [ 17 , 20 , 21 ]. The obtainment of dECM-based bioinks for 3D printing involves different steps [ 17 , 22 , 23 ].…”

Taking a Full Snapshot of Cancer Biology: Deciphering the Tumor Microenvironment for Effective Cancer Therapy in the Oncology Clinic

“…This expert review critically examines the TME components such as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and extracellular matrix (ECM) that can be reprogrammed to create a tumor-suppressive environment, thereby aiding in tumor treatment. Better cancer experimental models that mimic the TME such as tumor spheroids, microfluidics, three dimensional (3D) bioprinted models, and organoids will allow deeper investigations of the TME complexity and can lead to the translation of basic tumor biology to effective cancer treatments (Clevers, 2016;Drost and Clevers, 2018;Dzobo et al, 2018aDzobo et al, , 2019a.…”