2020
DOI: 10.1134/s0361768820080228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recent Trends in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs) – A Systematic Literature Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now, these models face various issues 19 which interrupt the network communications between sensor nodes. In this model, it has been assumed that the ocean current thickness is uniform with dynamic speeds, which stays in rows, and also, those currents control the sensor node movement 20 . But in real‐world usage, a correlation between the layers without neglecting the properties for cluster mobility in UWASNs is required.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, these models face various issues 19 which interrupt the network communications between sensor nodes. In this model, it has been assumed that the ocean current thickness is uniform with dynamic speeds, which stays in rows, and also, those currents control the sensor node movement 20 . But in real‐world usage, a correlation between the layers without neglecting the properties for cluster mobility in UWASNs is required.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), go to Step 2. Otherwise, stop the iteration and the final localization result is obtained as ( 1) N −…”
Section: Localization Node Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Underwater localization is widely used in underwater active/passive detection, autonomous underwater vehicle docking, underwater monitoring, and plays an important role in sea exploration. The existing underwater localization system mainly includes the underwater acoustic localization (UWAL) system and the underwater optical/wireless localization networks [1][2][3][4]. Since the propagation loss of the acoustic signal is much lower than that of the optic signal or the wireless signal in the water, the UWAL is the most effective way to achieve the long-range underwater localization [5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the growing demand for underwater marine applications, developing an underwater wireless communication connection has become a fast-growing yet challenging research subject in recent years. As evidence, many papers [1,2] offered underwater activities, including oil rig monitoring, offshore surveillance, port security, and geological studies, and associated expeditions solutions. However, due to substantial attenuation in the highly conductive medium, which restricts skin depth, existing models for wireless communication links in the air cannot be utilized underwater [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most related work, the challenges are the range of the link, reliable data transfer rate, and bandwidth capacity. To address these issues, two alternate approaches are usually utilized: (1) receiving RF signals at air while propagating at the seawater-air interface and then refract to the air path, followed by air to water signal propagation, due to a submerged transmitting source, and (2) utilizing the phenomenon of the guided wave at the air-seawater interface to build the wireless link. Several documents following both phenomena have been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%