Reception-Oriented Radio Rights: Increasing the Value of Wireless by Explicitly Defining and Delegating Radio Operating Rights

Vries, Jean Pierre De; Sieh, Kaleb August

doi:10.2139/ssrn.1907813

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The full consideration of what an appropriate definition of harmful interference is beyond the scope of this work. For further discussion about harmful interference, please refer to [10], [11].…”

Section: Enforcement and Spectrum Sharingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enforcement and Network Capacity in Spectrum Sharing: Quantifying the Benefits of Different Enforcement Scenarios

Altamimi

Weiss

2014

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recent studies have forecasted major growth in mobile broadband traffic. Due to the predicted high growth rate of mobile broadband traffic over the coming years (demand), there is a need for more wireless network capacity (supply). One of the major approaches to expand mobile wireless capacity is to add more spectrum to the market by enabling "spectrum sharing". The FCC has issued many reports indicating that the US is dangerously close to running out of capacity for mobile data, which is why the FCC and the NTIA have been working continually to enable spectrum sharing. Spectrum sharing has moved from being a radical notion to a principal policy focus in the past decade. Enabling spectrum sharing regimes means that sharing agreements must be implemented.To have meaning, those agreements must be enforceable. The focus of this paper is to determine the relationship between enforcement methodologies and benefits of spectrum sharing through sharing between government and commercial users. Sharing between the government incumbents (i.e. Federal or non-Federal agencies) and commercial wireless broadband operators/users is one of the key forms of spectrum sharing that is recommended by the NTIA, the FCC, and the PCAST report. To address this problem, we build a model to quantitatively examine the relationships between different enforcement scenarios and sharing benefits. We model two case studies, 1695-1710 MHz band and 3550-3650 MHz band.

show abstract

Section: Enforcement and Spectrum Sharingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Enforcement and Network Capacity in Spectrum Sharing: Quantifying the Benefits of Different Enforcement Scenarios

Altamimi

Weiss

2014

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As regulators increasingly migrate from a transmitter to a receiver perspective [25], for instance, a service provider would have to use the spectrum in a manner that did not cause interference with neighbors. Thus, the buyer of a spectrum band may still have to substantially alter the network (e.g., turn off base stations to alter the deployment) that may render a spectrum band not worth the cost.…”

Section: Conclusion and Consequencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

When is electromagnetic spectrum fungible?

Weiss

Krishnamurthy

Doyle

et al. 2012

2012 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Fungibility is a common assumption for marketbased spectrum management. In this paper, we explore the dimensions of practical fungibility of frequency bands from the point of view of the spectrum buyer who intends to use it. The exploration shows that fungibility is a complex, multidimensional concept that cannot casually be assumed. We develop two ideas for quantifying fungibility -(i) of a fungibility space in which the "distance" between two slices of spectrum provides score of fungibility and (ii) a probabilistic score of fungibility.

show abstract

“…For example, three possible extensions that could help primary users to define Interference Rights are Probability, Technology, and Penalties. 6) Probability: Primary users can set prices based on the ex ante estimated probability that a secondary user affects their existing services, since probabilistic rights parameters reflect the changing radio propagation environment [7]. For example, a secondary user that is estimated to affect 10% of existing transmission would pay less than users that would impact 20%.…”

Section: ) Durationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spectrum Trading with Interference Rights

Weiss¹,

Liu²

2012

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-Spectrum, which supports the transmission of sound, data, and video, is critical to the implementation of mobile connected society. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has been seeking policies that offer more spectrum access opportunities, such as secondary spectrum market and TV white space. In this paper, we develop the idea of trading spectrum in Interference Right. It means to alleviate the spectrum scarcity by cooperative spectrum usage and making the spectrum market as liquid as possible. We use some plausible case studies to illustrate the characteristics and features. The paper therefore includes a detailed description of trading procedures along with some first order quantitative modeling of the cases coupled with qualitative analysis.

show abstract

Reception-Oriented Radio Rights: Increasing the Value of Wireless by Explicitly Defining and Delegating Radio Operating Rights

Cited by 7 publications

References 25 publications

Enforcement and Network Capacity in Spectrum Sharing: Quantifying the Benefits of Different Enforcement Scenarios

Enforcement and Network Capacity in Spectrum Sharing: Quantifying the Benefits of Different Enforcement Scenarios

When is electromagnetic spectrum fungible?

Spectrum Trading with Interference Rights

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About