2007
DOI: 10.1002/prot.21607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Receptor‐specific scoring functions derived from quantum chemical models improve affinity estimates for in‐silico drug discovery

Abstract: The adaptation of forcefield-based scoring function to specific receptors remains an important challenge for in-silico drug discovery. Here we compare binding energies of forcefield-based scoring functions with models that are reparameterized on the basis of large-scale quantum calculations of the receptor. We compute binding energies of eleven ligands to the human estrogen receptor subtype alpha (ERalpha) and four ligands to the human retinoic acid receptor of isotype gamma (RARgamma). Using the FlexScreen al… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These individual potential terms can be combined into forcefields, some of which can already be selected in the graphical user interface (GUI), like protein forcefields PFF01/02[46] and the potential used in FlexScreen for receptor‐ligand docking. [47] The parameterizations of some of these forcefields exist for proteins, DNA and can be adapted using the atom‐type based assignment of parameters to small molecules. For parameterization of nonstandard systems, a parameter generator is supplied in the GUI, which can import partial charges from density functional theory (DFT) calculations and supply defaults for Van‐der‐Waals radii (which can be modified by the user).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These individual potential terms can be combined into forcefields, some of which can already be selected in the graphical user interface (GUI), like protein forcefields PFF01/02[46] and the potential used in FlexScreen for receptor‐ligand docking. [47] The parameterizations of some of these forcefields exist for proteins, DNA and can be adapted using the atom‐type based assignment of parameters to small molecules. For parameterization of nonstandard systems, a parameter generator is supplied in the GUI, which can import partial charges from density functional theory (DFT) calculations and supply defaults for Van‐der‐Waals radii (which can be modified by the user).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is used in the exploration of the binding space of the ligand and also in the evaluation of target–ligand complexes in molecular docking. The scoring functions can be categorized into knowledge-based [102103], force-field based [104105], empirical [106107] and consensus [108109]. These will be discussed below.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fischer et al 555 improved the scoring functions representing the binding energy for human estrogen receptor subtype R and human retinoic acid receptor of isotype γ, using atomic charges from FMO calculations at the RHF/STO-3G level and concluded that such quantum scoring functions (QSF) describe the electrostatics accurately, and that QSF performs better than force field analogues. Yoshida et al 556 applied FMO/RHF/6-31G to QSAR studies of the binding affinity of substituted benzenesulfonamides with carbonic anhydrase, noting the difficulties in modeling Zn 2+ -containing systems.…”
Section: δEmentioning
confidence: 99%