2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2021.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recipient and surgical factors trigger severe primary graft dysfunction after heart transplant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the rate of ECMO support was 23.5%, which was within the wide range from 2.1% to 31.6% as reported in previous studies [12][13][14][15][16]. Our institution adopts an active, prompt protocol and initiates ECMO support for almost every recipient with signifcant graft dysfunction, which may contribute to the high ECMO rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In this study, the rate of ECMO support was 23.5%, which was within the wide range from 2.1% to 31.6% as reported in previous studies [12][13][14][15][16]. Our institution adopts an active, prompt protocol and initiates ECMO support for almost every recipient with signifcant graft dysfunction, which may contribute to the high ECMO rate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“… 1 However, the success of heart transplantation continues to be limited by a paucity of donor organs and suboptimal transplant outcome. 2 , 3 , 4 In the current practice, the majority of donor organs are procured after being flushed with a cold preservation solution and then undergo static cold storage. Finally, all the organs are implanted under hypothermic and ischaemic conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, recipient and operative factors are important predictors of severe primary graft dysfunction and could interact with size matching. 9 Future work into donor-recipient matching should evaluate recipient and operative variables such as pulmonary vascular resistance and anticipated ischemic time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such studies are likely to be confounded by the changes in organ allocation systems and the COVID‐19 pandemic, both of which have occurred in this time. In addition, recipient and operative factors are important predictors of severe primary graft dysfunction and could interact with size matching 9 . Future work into donor–recipient matching should evaluate recipient and operative variables such as pulmonary vascular resistance and anticipated ischemic time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%