2018
DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocal relationships between self‐efficacy, outcome satisfaction, and attendance at an exercise programme

Abstract: Objectives. The objectives of this study were to (i) investigate directional influences of self-efficacy, outcome satisfaction, and attendance during an exercise programme and (ii) examine the predictive capabilities of self-efficacy and outcome satisfaction on participant dropout.Methods. Adults aged 35-65 years were recruited to a 12-month exercise programme. Self-efficacy was collected at baseline, three, six, nine, and 12 months, and outcome satisfaction at the same time-points except baseline. Cross-lagge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no significant association between therapist-patient interaction and self-efficacy. This finding concurs with the results of other studies, which reported that satisfaction with therapy outcome and selfefficacy were considered factors that can motivate patients to adhere to exercise program but without a causal relationship to each other (Selzler et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, there was no significant association between therapist-patient interaction and self-efficacy. This finding concurs with the results of other studies, which reported that satisfaction with therapy outcome and selfefficacy were considered factors that can motivate patients to adhere to exercise program but without a causal relationship to each other (Selzler et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…13 Within the exercise context, self-efficacy has been examined as a multidimensional construct, comprising three types: a) task SE, the confidence to complete basic exercise skills and movements; (b) coping SE, confidence to exercise in the face of challenges, such as lacking energy and; (c) scheduling SE, confidence to regularly schedule exercise sessions. 14 Extensive evidence demonstrates that the types of self-efficacy differentially predict exercise behaviour [15][16][17][18] which suggests that self-efficacy beliefs may have important implications for understanding the discordance between exercise intentions and behaviour. Indeed, researchers 10,16 have argued that assessing the roles of multiple efficacy constructs should prove useful in understanding complex behaviours such as the initiation of exercise, which requires effort, time, energy, and skills.…”
Section: The Intention Behaviour Gap In Exercisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lent et al (2007) examined the influence of social cognitive factors on student academic satisfaction and further confirmed the influence of self-efficacy on academic satisfaction in the context of engineering students in the United States. Similarly, the positive relationship between student self-efficacy and satisfaction has also been investigated by other empirical studies, such as Puzziferro (2008), Kuo et al (2014), Machmud (2018), andSelzler et al (2019). This study makes the argument that a student with higher self-efficacy tends to be stronger at achieving academic satisfaction.…”
Section: The Antecedents Of International Student Academic Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 52%