2018
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1803367115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocal space tomography of 3D skyrmion lattice order in a chiral magnet

Abstract: It is commonly assumed that surfaces modify the properties of stable materials within the top few atomic layers of a bulk specimen only. Exploiting the polarization dependence of resonant elastic X-ray scattering to go beyond conventional diffraction and imaging techniques, we have determined the depth dependence of the full 3D spin structure of skyrmions-that is, topologically nontrivial whirls of the magnetization-below the surface of a bulk sample of CuOSeO We found that the skyrmions change exponentially f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
82
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
4
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…88 Probing AFM domains with synchrotron X-rays Since the first measurement of X-ray magnetic scattering at the beginning of the 1980s, 103,104 probing AFM states and their domain structure with sub-micron resolution has become possible thanks to the multifold increase in spectral brightness at synchrotron sources over the last decades. One can classify the type of studies in three main categories: (1) scattering experiments with a micro-or nano-focused X-ray beam, in the hard or soft X-ray regime, where it is possible to simultaneously spatially resolve the AFM wave-vector and magnetization density, including chirality of the different domains, and in some cases their depth dependence, 105 (2) scanning X-ray microscopy and X-ray photo emission electron microscopy (PEEM) both using the absorption contrast produced by magnetic linear dichroism to probe the moment direction along the polarization direction of the incident light, and (3) coherent X-ray imaging in Bragg condition, to image certain types of AFM domains. 106 In the hard X-ray regime, and away from atomic resonances, coupling of the photon field to spin and orbital momentum of the electron is intrinsically weak (of the order hν/(mc 2 ), compared to Thomson scattering.…”
Section: Introduction To Afm Domains and Domain Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…88 Probing AFM domains with synchrotron X-rays Since the first measurement of X-ray magnetic scattering at the beginning of the 1980s, 103,104 probing AFM states and their domain structure with sub-micron resolution has become possible thanks to the multifold increase in spectral brightness at synchrotron sources over the last decades. One can classify the type of studies in three main categories: (1) scattering experiments with a micro-or nano-focused X-ray beam, in the hard or soft X-ray regime, where it is possible to simultaneously spatially resolve the AFM wave-vector and magnetization density, including chirality of the different domains, and in some cases their depth dependence, 105 (2) scanning X-ray microscopy and X-ray photo emission electron microscopy (PEEM) both using the absorption contrast produced by magnetic linear dichroism to probe the moment direction along the polarization direction of the incident light, and (3) coherent X-ray imaging in Bragg condition, to image certain types of AFM domains. 106 In the hard X-ray regime, and away from atomic resonances, coupling of the photon field to spin and orbital momentum of the electron is intrinsically weak (of the order hν/(mc 2 ), compared to Thomson scattering.…”
Section: Introduction To Afm Domains and Domain Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in the soft regime, it is possible to exploit the large change in absorption at energies close to certain atomic resonance to probe the change in magnetization as of function of depth, virtually impossible to access with other techniques. This was employed successfully recently to probe the magnetization reconstruction of skyrmion lattices close to the surface, 105 and could possibly be exploited to access domain information in buried interfaces. Magnetic soft X-ray scattering is unfortunately limited since the Bragg condition can only be satisfied for small momentum transfer (i.e.…”
Section: Introduction To Afm Domains and Domain Wallsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Homochiral systems not only have been widely involved in chemical processes such as catalysis, chiral separation, enantioselective sensors, and molecular recognition, but also have played a crucial role in specific physical properties due to the compatibility between the corresponding electronic, optical, magnetic, and structural properties (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). The intriguing physical phenomena including chiral magnetic effect, chiral superconductivity, and chiral photonics, offer them a wide range of applications in optoelectronics, information storage, polarization optics, spintronic devices, liquid crystal displays, chiroptical switches, and nanomotors (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21). As an important subject of ferroelectrics in classical physics, it is of great potential to incorporate the homochirality to ferroelectricity to broaden much more fascinating applications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity of a crystalline Bragg peak or magnetic satellites may be studied, permitting to clearly identify the hosting magnetic state of a given excitation via the scattering pattern in reciprocal space. As a point of reference, we demonstrate the potential of REXS-FMR using the insulating cubic chiral magnet Cu 2 OSeO 3 , which was studied previously both by means of REXS [26][27][28][29][30][31] and standard microwave spectroscopy [11,12,[32][33][34][35][36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…At intermediate magnetic field just below T c , a pocket of skyrmion lattice state is observed. The trigonal order of the spin whirls in the plane perpendicular to the field translates to the characteristic sixfold pattern of magnetic satellites in both small-angle neutron scattering [41][42][43][44][45] and REXS [26][27][28][29][30][31], as shown in Fig. 1(e).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%