1994
DOI: 10.1080/00220671.1994.9944834
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocal Teaching in a Regular Primary School Classroom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
1
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
26
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, reciprocal teaching-which involves the reciprocal interaction of experts and novices in explicit, overt demonstrations of strategy use-has documented significant benefits for first language (L 1 ) students. Since the original work of Palincsar and Brown (1984), the reciprocal teaching procedure has been found highly successful in helping L1 poor readers improve their level of reading comprehension (Bruce & Chan 1991, Gilroy & Moore, 1988, Hodge 1993, Kelly, Moore, & Tuck 1994, King & Parent Johnson1999, Lederer, 2000, Lysynchuk 1989, Marks et al 1993). The results of previous studies seem to be promising and encouraging for L 1 readers.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Among them, reciprocal teaching-which involves the reciprocal interaction of experts and novices in explicit, overt demonstrations of strategy use-has documented significant benefits for first language (L 1 ) students. Since the original work of Palincsar and Brown (1984), the reciprocal teaching procedure has been found highly successful in helping L1 poor readers improve their level of reading comprehension (Bruce & Chan 1991, Gilroy & Moore, 1988, Hodge 1993, Kelly, Moore, & Tuck 1994, King & Parent Johnson1999, Lederer, 2000, Lysynchuk 1989, Marks et al 1993). The results of previous studies seem to be promising and encouraging for L 1 readers.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…La razón más plausible es que los textos naturales empleados presentaban pocas dificultades léxicas o ambigüedades sintácticas, con lo cual la clarificación de términos que no se entendían, así como de cualquier otra dificultad de comprensión fue una habilidad poco practicada. Así, nuestros resultados respaldan la eficacia de la ER aplicada por profesores en el aula ordinaria, coincidiendo con otros estudios previos (Alfassi, 1998(Alfassi, , 2004 sar, 1989;Hart y Speece, 1998;Hacker y Tenent, 2002;Kelly, Moore y Tuck, 1994;Mason, 2004;Rosenshine y Meister, 1994;Santiago, 2005;Soriano, Vidal-Abarca y Miranda, 1996;Soriano, Chebaani, Soriano y Descals, 2011).…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified
“…In the last 15 years, many intervention studies have investigated the effects of strategy training programmes (Aarnoutse, 1982;Palincsar & Brown, 1984;Paris et al, 1984;Pressley et al, 1989;Lysynchuk et al, 1990;Pearson & Fielding, 1991;Roehler & Duffy, 1991;Walraven et al, 1993;Kelly et al, 1994;O'Sullivan & Pressley, 1994).…”
Section: Instruction In Text Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 98%