2011
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2131311
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reciprocal Trade Agreements: Impacts on Bilateral Trade Expansion and Contraction in the World Agricultural Marketplace

Abstract: The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and, where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require altern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with previous studies the results reveal that the average RTA significantly increases members' agricultural trade (Grant and Lambert 2008;Vollrath and Hallahan 2011).…”
Section: The Hierarchy Of Rtassupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistent with previous studies the results reveal that the average RTA significantly increases members' agricultural trade (Grant and Lambert 2008;Vollrath and Hallahan 2011).…”
Section: The Hierarchy Of Rtassupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Lambert and McKoy (2009) report a 153 and 101 percent increase in agriculture and food-based trade, respectively. Equally impressive RTA effects have been documented in Vollrath and Hallahan (2011), Sun and Reed (2010), Karemera and Koo (2007), Vollrath, Hallahan and Gelhar (2009), Jayasinghe and Sarker (2008), and Sarker and Jayasinghe (2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Nonetheless, applications of Anderson and van Wincoop () in the second, empirical strand often replace aggregate trade as the dependent variable with a “finer classification” of trade. This “finer classification” has often been agricultural trade (e.g., see Lambert and McKoy, ; Vollrath and Hallahan, ; Villoria, ; Philippidis et al., ; and Grant, ). Rauch () examines a wider array of goods by disaggregating tradables according to market characteristics of the goods: “[goods] traded on organized exchanges, [goods] not traded on organized exchanges but nevertheless possessing … ‘reference prices’, and all other commodities,” (p. 8).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In response to these shortcomings of the gravity model of trade, a general form was proposed by Anderson and van Wincoop (2003) to account for multilateral resistance between trading partners. The general form of the gravity model uses partner binary variables to capture the heterogeneity between trading partners without explicitly defining the cultural, political, and economic factors that may influence trade, including binary variables that account for cultural and economic heterogeneity as well as changes in price of the imported good over time (Vollrath and Hallahan 2011). By generalizing the gravity model, the specified nuances from the original model are reduced to country-specific effects which are tractable and provide a robust analysis for works focused on the impacts of exogenous trade shocks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%