“…In these analogue studies, participants (usually undergraduate psychology students participating for course credit) have been presented with a disclosure stimulus embedded in a written transcript, audiotape, or videotape of a hypothetical therapy session, after which they rate their perceptions of the disclosure or of the therapist. Of 18 analogue studies of therapist self-disclosure in individual therapy, 14 reported positive perceptions of therapist self-disclosure (Bundza & Simonson, 1973; Doster & Brooks, 1974; Dowd & Boroto, 1982; Feigenbaum, 1977; Fox, Strum, & Walters, 1984; Hoffman-Graff, 1977; Myrick, 1969; Nilsson, Strassberg, & Bannon, 1979; Peca-Baker & Friedlander, 1987; Simonson, 1976; Simonson & Bahr, 1974; VandeCreek & Angstadt, 1985; Watkins & Schneider, 1989; Wetzel & Wright-Buckley, 1988), 3 reported negative perceptions (Carter & Motta, 1988; Cherbosque, 1987; Curtis, 1982), and 1 reported mixed findings (Goodyear & Shumate, 1996). In his review of this analogue literature, Watkins (1990) concluded that therapists who self-disclosed in a moderate or nonintimate way have been viewed more favorably and have elicited more client self-disclosure than therapists who did not disclose at all, who disclosed a lot, or who disclosed very intimate material.…”