Procedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2013 2013
DOI: 10.5244/c.27.127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recognizing Humans in Motion: Trajectory-based Aerial Video Analysis

Abstract: We propose a novel method for recognizing people in aerial surveillance videos. Aerial surveillance images cover a wide area at low resolution. In order to detect objects (e.g., pedestrians) from such videos, conventional methods either utilize appearance information from raw videos or extract blob information from background subtraction results. However, people seen in low resolution images have less appearance information, and hence are very difficulty to classify based on their appearance or blob size. In a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitative analyses of our image registration, moving object detection and tracking performance have yielded greater average stationary state registration PSNR values and detection F1 scores than those from [18]. The overall classification accuracy was greater than in [2] and [3]. Considering major application differences, such as our use of feature based methods aided with different descriptors for image registration, our real-time approach using a sampled video with lower fps, use of different datasets and learning techniques, and possible differences in our camera setting such as UAV related hardware, it is difficult to evaluate the significance of these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quantitative analyses of our image registration, moving object detection and tracking performance have yielded greater average stationary state registration PSNR values and detection F1 scores than those from [18]. The overall classification accuracy was greater than in [2] and [3]. Considering major application differences, such as our use of feature based methods aided with different descriptors for image registration, our real-time approach using a sampled video with lower fps, use of different datasets and learning techniques, and possible differences in our camera setting such as UAV related hardware, it is difficult to evaluate the significance of these results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In their study Máttyus et al [1] accomplished object detection and tracking for vehicles and humans in realtime from low altitude aerial surveillance. In addition to the detection and tracking, Iwashita et al [2] also performed classification with 80% accuracy for vehicles and humans but the operation was not in real-time. Another similar study is conducted by Oreifej et al [3] where they performed detection and classification for humans but not tracking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, online action detection aims to identify ongoing actions from streaming videos at every moment in time. This task is useful for many real-world applications, such as autonomous driving [6], robot assistants [7], and surveillance systems [8], [9]. Also, online action detection in these applications can be developed to more challenging tasks (e.g., action anticipation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…process includes localizing temporal boundaries and classifying the class of each instance. Temporal action detection can be used in many applications such as smart surveillance [1], [2], video summarization [3], [4], [5], and video retrieval [6], [7], [8]. Similar to object proposals for object detection [9], [10], [11], temporal action proposals play an important role in temporal action detection [12], [13], [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%