2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2022.154020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recoil energy dependence of primary radiation damage in tungsten from cascade overlap with voids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the presented simulation results, it can be seen that the main changes in the structure were observed only when the maximum range of ions was reached, which was characterized by the dominance of ionization losses associated with the interaction of ions with the nuclear subsystem. At the same time, these shifts were most pronounced only in the case of reaching the maximum irradiation fluences of 10 14 -10 15 ion/cm 2 , which, according to a number of literature data, were characteristic of the effect of deep overlapping of defective regions formed during irradiation [32,33]. The results of the dependence of the irradiation fluence and the accumulated atomic displacements obtained from the calculated data of ionization losses are presented in Figure 3.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…According to the presented simulation results, it can be seen that the main changes in the structure were observed only when the maximum range of ions was reached, which was characterized by the dominance of ionization losses associated with the interaction of ions with the nuclear subsystem. At the same time, these shifts were most pronounced only in the case of reaching the maximum irradiation fluences of 10 14 -10 15 ion/cm 2 , which, according to a number of literature data, were characteristic of the effect of deep overlapping of defective regions formed during irradiation [32,33]. The results of the dependence of the irradiation fluence and the accumulated atomic displacements obtained from the calculated data of ionization losses are presented in Figure 3.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 58%