1976
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(76)90051-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recoil properties of spallation products from bombardment of Z = 13–29 targets with 150,300 and 600 MeV protons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The situation is different in the case of the true spallation reactions of interest here, where F/B >>1. Consequently, although the results do not differ by much, we have, following the suggestion of an anonymous reviewer, redone our calculations using the more generally applicable approach of Lagarde-Simonoff et al (1976). Equations 4 and 4a of these authors give the numbers of forward (F) and backward (B) recoils, respectively, as a function of range R, target thickness W and three additional parameters For our calculations N for the relevant energy range was obtained from the range-energy relations of Ziegler et al (2003).…”
Section: ≡0mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The situation is different in the case of the true spallation reactions of interest here, where F/B >>1. Consequently, although the results do not differ by much, we have, following the suggestion of an anonymous reviewer, redone our calculations using the more generally applicable approach of Lagarde-Simonoff et al (1976). Equations 4 and 4a of these authors give the numbers of forward (F) and backward (B) recoils, respectively, as a function of range R, target thickness W and three additional parameters For our calculations N for the relevant energy range was obtained from the range-energy relations of Ziegler et al (2003).…”
Section: ≡0mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations 4 and 4a of these authors give the numbers of forward (F) and backward (B) recoils, respectively, as a function of range R, target thickness W and three additional parameters For our calculations N for the relevant energy range was obtained from the range-energy relations of Ziegler et al (2003). Then, as in Lagarde-Simonoff et al (1976), η as well as the resulting ratio of recoil range to target thickness, was determined by varying η in the range 0 to 1 until the predicted ratio Q cal = 2(F + B)/(F − B) matched the observed one. Recoil ranges determined in this way are shorter than those calculated using the Sugarman et al (1956) formalism.…”
Section: ≡0mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The kinetic energy T also increases almost linearly with an increase of AA, as explained by a random-walk theory [13]. Proton results on natcu [14][15][16][17][18][19] are available at various proton energies (Ep), as indicated in the inset of From a comparison with the proton results for other targets of 27A1, natv, natAg, natTa and 197Au [3,4], it was found that for typical spallation the v values of proton-reactions at Ep < 3 GeV are higher than those of photon-reactions at E0 > 600 MeV, and decrease steeply with an increase of Ep up to around Ep = 3 GeV, and become constant at higher energies. This distinct difference of the v values in the two types of nuclear reaction at the lower-energy region may be attributed to the lower momentum transferred in the initial electromagnetic resonance interaction in photon-reactions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Irradiations of copper are very frequently reported in the literature [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and this was the target used by CUMMING et al [7] when they arrived at their conclusions, later supported by the work of LUND et al [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%