Recollecting What We Once Knew: My Life in Psycholinguistics

Abstract

The mid-twentieth century brought a radical change in how the linguistics community formulated its major goal, moving from a largely taxonomic science to Chomsky's revolution, which conceptualized language as a higher-order cognitive function. This article reviews the paths (not always direct) that brought Lila Gleitman into contact with that revolution, her contributions to it, and the evolution in her thinking about how language is learned by every child, regardless of extreme variation in the input received. To understand how that occurs, we need to discover what must be learned by the child and what is already there to guide that learning—what must be, in Plato's terms, “recollected.” The growing picture shows a learner equipped with information-processing mechanisms that extract evidence about word meanings using various evidential sources. Chief among these are the observational and linguistic-syntactic contexts in which words occur. The former is supported by a mechanism Gleitman and her collaborators call “propose but verify,” and the latter by a mechanism known as “syntactic boot-strapping.” Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 73 is January 2022. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

Speech Production on Special Needs Children (Down Syndrome): a Psycholinguistic Study at SLB Mekar Sari 1 Cibinong

“…Tanpa bahasa, seseorang tidak dapat melakukan interaksi sosial dengan masyarakat sekitarnya. Psikolinguistik adalah studi bahasa dari sudut pandang psikologis (Gleitman & Gleitman, 2022). Psikolinguistik memiliki fokus utama yaitu: pemerolehan bahasa, pemahaman bahasa dan produksi bahasa, termasuk bagaimana produksi ujaran itu dihasilkan (Tripp & Munson, 2022).…”

Psycholinguistics: Analysis of Knowledge Domains on Children’s Language Acquisition, Production, Comprehension, and Dissolution

“…There has been an expansion of psycholinguistics to examine more specific aspects of human language, such as the production of language [ 31 ] and integrating the study of language with the cognitive sciences [ 32 ]. Recent reviews of psycholinguistics have focused on the use of offline measures of language comprehension [ 33 ], psycholinguistics and teaching and learning settings to enhance education [ 34 ], and the syntactic and cognitive aspects of language acquisition and learning [ 35 ]. Recent bibliometric analyses examined data from 1900 to 2021 concerning child language, which is the subject of psycholinguistic research.…”

How children learn to understand language meanings: a neural model of adult–child multimodal interactions in real-time

“…The importance of how language learning and its meaning occur for understanding the human condition is reflected by a large number of articles and books that have been written about it (e.g., Boroditsky, 2000;Boroditsky and Ramscar, 2002;Kable et al, 2002Kable et al, , 2005Richardson et al, 2003;Hauk and Pulvemuller, 2004;Gallese and Lakoff, 2005;Pecher and Zwaan, 2005;Wallentin et al, 2005Wallentin et al, , 2011Gibbs, 2006;Zwaan and Taylor, 2006;Chatterjee, 2008Chatterjee, , 2010Fischer and Zwaan, 2008;Holtgraves and Kashima, 2008;Kemmerer et al, 2008;Mahon and Caramazza, 2008;Boulenger et al, 2009;Dove, 2009;Raposo et al, 2009;Casasanto and Dijkstra, 2010;Glenberg, 2010;Glenberg and Kaschak, 2010;Saygin et al, 2010;Bergen, 2012;Aziz-Aadeh, 2013;Fernardino et al, 2013;Watson et al, 2013;Colston, 2019;Carey, 2022;Gleitman and Gleitman, 2022). Although such contributions include many facts about language learning and meaning, they do not provide a unifying mechanistic neural explanation of these data, or of the organizational principles that shape these brain mechanisms.…”