2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recolonisation of powerline corridor vegetation by small mammals: Timing and the influence of vegetation management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect has been repeatedly shown for birds (Kroodsma 1982;King et al 2009;Meehan and Haas 1997) and mammals (Gates 1991) in eastern North America and for a variety of small vertebrates in Australia (Goosem and Marsh 1997;Clarke et al 2006;Clarke and White 2008a, b). As was found in the current study, these grassland species may be quite uncommon elsewhere within the landscape (Clarke and White 2008b). Similar patterns exist for vascular plants in the southeastern USA, where powerline corridors serve as refuges in an otherwise forested matrix for a number of critically endangered grassland/savanna species (Sorrie and Weakley 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This effect has been repeatedly shown for birds (Kroodsma 1982;King et al 2009;Meehan and Haas 1997) and mammals (Gates 1991) in eastern North America and for a variety of small vertebrates in Australia (Goosem and Marsh 1997;Clarke et al 2006;Clarke and White 2008a, b). As was found in the current study, these grassland species may be quite uncommon elsewhere within the landscape (Clarke and White 2008b). Similar patterns exist for vascular plants in the southeastern USA, where powerline corridors serve as refuges in an otherwise forested matrix for a number of critically endangered grassland/savanna species (Sorrie and Weakley 2001).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Telemetry confirmed this result, with animals always located in dense vegetation. A similar preference for dense vegetation cover has been observed elsewhere (Bubela and Happold 1993;Clarke and White 2008;Happold 2011). Dense vegetation cover provides M. fuscus with foraging opportunities, nesting sites, and protection from predators (Wallis 1992;Green and Osborne 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…At the time of our study, vegetation had not been managed on the ski runs in the telemetry study area in the preceding 12 months. Other studies also have documented the ability of M. fuscus to colonize previously disturbed sites once low vegetation structural complexity is regained (Driessen 1999;Clarke and White 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both years of the study experienced similar weather, and there were no discrete weather events that would explain the patterns of population abundance we saw between years. Rather, shifts in species relative population abundance between years is likely due to successional changes, and has been observed in other studies of young pine plantations in the southeastern USA, and in secondary succession of both forest and grassland habitat types [36,38,39]. Sigmodon hispidus prefers grassy understory [40,41], which was not available on study plots until 2010.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%