2021
DOI: 10.1109/tii.2020.3008923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendation by Users’ Multimodal Preferences for Smart City Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The implementation of smart cities is not without its challenges. One of the main challenges is social inclusion and equity in access to technology [11]. It is important to ensure that all citizens can benefit from the improvements offered by technology, thus avoiding the digital divide.…”
Section: Background Of Smart Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of smart cities is not without its challenges. One of the main challenges is social inclusion and equity in access to technology [11]. It is important to ensure that all citizens can benefit from the improvements offered by technology, thus avoiding the digital divide.…”
Section: Background Of Smart Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first category involves learning representations from different modal features individually and then directly concatenating or averaging these representations to generate multi-modal representations of users or items. For example, users' multimodal preferences-based recommendation (UMPR) [8] is a recommendation model that captures users' multi-modal preferences by mining information from user comments to obtain user-level visual preferences. To further enhance item cold start performance, the Pre-trained Multimodal Graph Transformer (PMGT) [9] model integrates multi-modal information into item representations and achieves pre-training on a homogeneous item graph.…”
Section: B Multi-modal Recommendation Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[60], [53] MLP / Concat None 1 Model Optimization (Section 4): all of the two-step training models are bolded in reference, while others are optimized in End-to-End manner.…”
Section: Restaurantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, though UMPR [53] does not have an explicit CL loss function, it also constructs a loss function that describes the difference between visual positive and negative samples.…”
Section: Contrastive Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%