2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommendations for motion correction of infant fNIRS data applicable to multiple data sets and acquisition systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
161
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
161
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (deoxy-Hb) have different absorption spectra in the infrared range, fNIRS imaging quantifies the levels of oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb by evaluating changes in near-infrared light intensity migrating from the source to a detector. Signals reflecting changes in oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb concentrations are calculated based on the modified Beer-Lambert's law to infer local brain activation (Obrig and Villringer, 2003;Renata et al, 2019). The advantage of fNIRS is that the equipment is relatively stable, avoiding motion artifacts and making it suitable for the study of cortical responses during complex motor stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since oxygenated hemoglobin (oxy-Hb) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (deoxy-Hb) have different absorption spectra in the infrared range, fNIRS imaging quantifies the levels of oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb by evaluating changes in near-infrared light intensity migrating from the source to a detector. Signals reflecting changes in oxy-Hb and deoxy-Hb concentrations are calculated based on the modified Beer-Lambert's law to infer local brain activation (Obrig and Villringer, 2003;Renata et al, 2019). The advantage of fNIRS is that the equipment is relatively stable, avoiding motion artifacts and making it suitable for the study of cortical responses during complex motor stimulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible reason for the variability between the studies could be the different levels of motion present in each study. This variability has also been evaluated in a recent fNIRS study [33]. To address this topic, we performed a supplementary analysis of the low motion, medium motion, and high motion HW task data in dataset 2 (Fig.…”
Section: On Different Performance Of Motion Correction Methods In Fnimentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Most fNIRS studies measure the efficiency of motion removal techniques based on the recovery of a synthetic HRF [31][32][33]36], or, in the case of real data, based on the variance across subjects or datasets [33]. However, since HD-DOT is focused on creating images comparable to fMRI, throughout this paper, we have used an fMRI dataset with the same task and resting state paradigm used in our HD-DOT datasets as a gold standard for evaluating the efficacy of different motion removal methods.…”
Section: Evaluation and Validation Of Denoising Through Comparisons Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of further note, particularly for pediatric populations, is fNIRS' tolerance for moderate amounts of movement compared to traditional neuroimaging techniques. Whilst researchers should still seek to limit movement where possible, advances in motion correction algorithms 45 allow less data to need to be rejected on the grounds of movement artefacts (for a comparison of common algorithms, see Brigadoi et al) 46 This allows participants to be awake, alert and interacting with a task of stimuli, as opposed to fMRI or MEG imaging which requires most pediatric participants to be asleep or sedated during scanning.…”
Section: Benefits and Limitations Of Optical Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%