2007
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.2848
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommended criteria for the mass spectrometric identification of target peptides and proteins (<8 kDa) in sports drug testing

Abstract: Mass spectrometry has become an invaluable tool for the identification of prohibited peptide hormones and proteins in doping control analysis. Regulatory authorities have established criteria for identifying banned drugs in doping control specimens, but these criteria do not address the specific issues for high molecular weight protein drugs such as molecular weight determination of multiply charged molecules, analysis of chemically or enzymatically derived degradation products, identification of amino acid se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These criteria are consistent with those proposed by other authors for the analysis of rhEPO analogues in the horse [27], but with the addition in the current study of a relative retention time tolerance due to the inclusion of an internal standard. Furthermore, in conjunction with the other factors described in the above ''Method Validation'', these criteria also fulfil the proposals of Thevis et al [31]. According to the identification points (IP) system proposed by the aforementioned authors (where a minimum score of 5 IP was suggested), the current confirmatory approach would lead to the allocation of 6.5 IP for each peptide (1 for the MS/ MS precursor ion, 1.5 for each of three product ions and 1 for immunoaffinity purification during sample preparation).…”
Section: Auto-injection Carryoversupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These criteria are consistent with those proposed by other authors for the analysis of rhEPO analogues in the horse [27], but with the addition in the current study of a relative retention time tolerance due to the inclusion of an internal standard. Furthermore, in conjunction with the other factors described in the above ''Method Validation'', these criteria also fulfil the proposals of Thevis et al [31]. According to the identification points (IP) system proposed by the aforementioned authors (where a minimum score of 5 IP was suggested), the current confirmatory approach would lead to the allocation of 6.5 IP for each peptide (1 for the MS/ MS precursor ion, 1.5 for each of three product ions and 1 for immunoaffinity purification during sample preparation).…”
Section: Auto-injection Carryoversupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Thevis et al [31] have proposed criteria for the confirmatory detection of biological macromolecules (up to 8,000 kDa) in samples from human athletes by WADA laboratories. However, specific guidance notes for animal sports testing laboratories are currently lacking, so the following in house confirmatory criteria for the detection of rhEPO analogues in equine plasma and urine were applied:…”
Section: Auto-injection Carryovermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 and 4). In order to fulfil suggested criteria for the identification of peptides and proteins in doping control analysis,37 the three most abundant multiply protonated molecules were additionally subjected to low‐energy CID without inducing dissociation of IGF‐1 and its analogues (Table 1). Owing to the considerable stability of the IGF‐1 molecule described earlier, these pseudo‐MS/MS experiments (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique requires a highly effective sample preparation procedure to prevent the nano‐UPLC system from blocking and/or ion suppression effects 17. Immunoaffinity purification prior to LC provides a well‐established and powerful tool in peptide analysis and represents an additional dimension in the separation process 10, 18, 19…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%