2000
DOI: 10.1002/1521-186x(200010)21:7<508::aid-bem4>3.0.co;2-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recommended minimal requirements and development guidelines for exposure setups of bio-experiments addressing the health risk concern of wireless communications

Abstract: The evidence currently available on the potential health effects from electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure has been largely judged as being too tentative and inadequate to meet criteria for assessing health risks. Some of the main reasons for these shortcomings lie in the incomplete description of the exposure and poorly characterized dosimetry. Well-defined exposure conditions are essential to obtain reproducible and scientifically valuable results. To facilitate the development of optimized setups for specif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
84
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, general guidelines and minimal requirements have been defined and published in the literature [25][26][27][28] suggesting specific procedures and methods to be followed in the realization of RF in vitro exposure setups in order to pursue reliability and reproducibility of the results.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Requirementssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, general guidelines and minimal requirements have been defined and published in the literature [25][26][27][28] suggesting specific procedures and methods to be followed in the realization of RF in vitro exposure setups in order to pursue reliability and reproducibility of the results.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Requirementssupporting
confidence: 76%
“… the uniformity of SAR distribution inside the sample, which must be as high as possible, although an overall standard deviation from homogeneity of less than 30% is considered acceptable [26];  the SAR efficiency, which is defined as the ratio between the average SAR and the input power at the feeding end of the RF applicator, and can be increased by optimizing the coupling condition between the induced electromagnetic field and the sample;  the thermal increase in the biological sample, which, in the framework of the evaluation of non-thermal effects of EM fields, should be insignificant (< 0.1 °C). This means that either the SAR level throughout the exposure must be low enough to avoid sample heating, or the exposure system must be provided with specific thermoregulation tools that counteract the undesired thermal increases.…”
Section: Electromagnetic Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependence of RF exposure on device design, position at head, head shape, internal anatomy, and metallic accessories such as glasses, jewelry, and metallic implants, has been summarized (Burkhardt and Kuster, 1999;Kuster, 2000Kuster, , 2001. For a given antenna input power, device design and device position relative to the head appear to have the largest impact on the strength and distribution of the induced fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To maximize the count of cells subjecting to the same exposure intensity, low exposure heterogeneity is desired in cells. For in vitro experiments, the heterogeneity is suggested to be no more than 30%, as measured by the SAR SD [8]. Due to the inherent SAR distribution in cells, it is difficult to change the exposure efficiency and heterogeneity by tunable devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%