Reconceptualizing cultural participation in Europe: Grey literature review

Tomka, Goran

doi:10.1080/09548963.2013.819657

Cited by 27 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As the name implies, they only consider GL sources in their pool of reviewed sources. Many GLR studies have also appeared in other disciplines, e.g., in medicine or social science [37][38][39][40]. For example, a GLR of special events for promoting cancer screenings was reported in [37].…”

Section: Figure 2-relationship Among Different Types Of Systematic Sementioning

confidence: 99%

Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering

Garousi

Felderer

Mäntylä

2019

Information and Software Technology

522

458

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Context: A Multivocal Literature Review (MLR) is a form of a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) which includes the grey literature (e.g., blog posts, videos and white papers) in addition to the published (formal) literature (e.g., journal and conference papers). MLRs are useful for both researchers and practitioners since they provide summaries both the state-of-the art and -practice in a given area. MLRs are popular in other fields and have recently started to appear in software engineering (SE). As more MLR studies are conducted and reported, it is important to have a set of guidelines to ensure high quality of MLR processes and their results.Objective: There are several guidelines to conduct SLR studies in SE. However, several phases of MLRs differ from those of traditional SLRs, for instance with respect to the search process and source quality assessment. Therefore, SLR guidelines are only partially useful for conducting MLR studies. Our goal in this paper is to present guidelines on how to conduct MLR studies in SE. Method:To develop the MLR guidelines, we benefit from several inputs: (1) existing SLR guidelines in SE, (2), a literature survey of MLR guidelines and experience papers in other fields, and (3) our own experiences in conducting several MLRs in SE. We took the popular SLR guidelines of Kitchenham and Charters as the baseline and extended/adopted them to conduct MLR studies in SE. All derived guidelines are discussed in the context of an already-published MLR in SE as the running example. Results:The resulting guidelines cover all phases of conducting and reporting MLRs in SE from the planning phase, over conducting the review to the final reporting of the review. In particular, we believe that incorporating and adopting a vast set of experience-based recommendations from MLR guidelines and experience papers in other fields have enabled us to propose a set of guidelines with solid foundations. Conclusion:Having been developed on the basis of several types of experience and evidence, the provided MLR guidelines will support researchers to effectively and efficiently conduct new MLRs in any area of SE. The authors recommend the researchers to utilize these guidelines in their MLR studies and then share their lessons learned and experiences.

show abstract

Section: Figure 2-relationship Among Different Types Of Systematic Sementioning

confidence: 99%

Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering

Garousi

Felderer

Mäntylä

2019

Information and Software Technology

522

458

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kothari and Cooke 2001). Although previous studies have noted that such practices provide participants with benefits related to the cultural (Tomka 2013;Mandiola 2016;Stevenson, Balling, and Kann-Rasmussen 2017), social (Guillen, Coromina, and Saris 2011;Putnam 2000), economic (Deng and Meng 2013;Cobley 2013), and political dimensions of participation (Ivaldi, Bonati, and Soliani 2017), in this article we offer a more structural and critical account of the participation and activation paradigm and 'empowerment' discourse (see Ekholm and Lindström Sol 2019).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 95%

Workers’ and volunteers’ ideas about the benefits of young people’s cultural participation: a critical capital-based approach

Husu

Kumpulainen

2020

International Journal of Cultural Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Antigamente, a participação na cultura simbolizava uma forma das instituições culturais se tornarem mais acessíveis através do envolvimento/interação com as audiências, sobretudo no que diz respeito a grupos tradicionalmente sub-representados em perfis de visitantes (Bonet & Négrier, 2018;Virolainen, 2016). Estudos sobre a participação na cultura refletem muitas vezes preocupações de política cultural nacional relativas à desigualdade na participação na cultura com financiamento público (Stevenson et al, 2017;Taylor, 2016;Tomka, 2013). Os números demonstram que as chamadas taxas de participação, quando relativas à participação em artes subsidiadas, estão a decrescer e já foi consistentemente demonstrado que estão relacionadas com o contexto socioeconómico (Stevenson et al, 2017;Taylor, 2016;Vestheim, 2007).…”

Section: Participação Na Política Culturalunclassified

O valor democrático da participação na política cultural sueca

Sol

2019

revistacomsoc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Através da exploração da política cultural sueca, este artigo analisa o modo como a política legítima o apoio às artes e à cultura e a “participação” é importante para este processo, discutindo a forma como diferentes entendimentos da cultura e a participação se relacionam com as noções variáveis da governação democrática na cultura. O artigo discute de que modo um discurso abrangente de cultura considerado positivo e, por conseguinte, de interesse e responsabilidade para a política, pode ser entendido como dois discursos: 1) a cultura é positiva, pois promove coisas boas e 2) a cultura é positiva, pois evita coisas más. Estes dois discursos estão assentes em lógicas diferentes e determinam o conceito de participação de diferentes formas, contudo são construídos como se fossem compatíveis. O significado de governação democrática na cultura é também interpretado de forma diferente nos dois discursos – a proteção da autonomia, igualdade no acesso à cultura e participação como parte integrante são classificadas como democracia corporativista, ao passo que a garantia de sociedades sustentáveis em risco e a participação como igual possibilidade de influência são classificadas como democracia populista. Esta quebra no discurso é interpretada como sinal de redução da legitimidade de um discurso corporativista da democracia, no qual especialistas tiveram o poder de decidir o conteúdo da política cultural. Este artigo integra a discussão sobre o papel da participação e da democracia na política cultural.

show abstract

Reconceptualizing cultural participation in Europe: Grey literature review

Cited by 27 publications

References 1 publication

Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering

Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering

Workers’ and volunteers’ ideas about the benefits of young people’s cultural participation: a critical capital-based approach

O valor democrático da participação na política cultural sueca

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About