2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2011.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciliation of contrasting theories for fracture spacing in layered rocks

Abstract: Natural and man-made brittle layers embedded in a weaker matrix and subjected to layer-parallel extension typically develop an array of opening-mode fractures with a remarkably regular spacing. This spacing often scales with layer thickness, and it decreases as extension increases until fracture saturation is reached. Existing analytical one-dimensional (1-D) 'full-slip' models which assume that interfacial slip occurs over the entire length of the fracture-bound blocks predict that the ratio of fracture spaci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
69
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is the effect of three different aspects of the model:The heterogeneity in the particle packing of the veins produces local weaknesses that allow fractures to crosscut the vein or reactivate either the vein or the interface (see chapter 4.1.2).Fractures in the DEM Model exhibit a higher degree of sinuosity and roughness than the straight, parallel veins in the conceptual model due to the intrinsic heterogeneity of the models and the structural dimension of the particle packing [ Hull , ]. A higher degree of interaction is therefore inevitable.The loading mechanism produces fractures with a characteristic spacing that results from the geometry of the setup as well as the ratio of tensile strength of the brittle layer and interface shear strength [ Schöpfer et al ., ]. Fractures have therefore a tendency to form in the same sequence at approximately the same position along the extension direction in each model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the effect of three different aspects of the model:The heterogeneity in the particle packing of the veins produces local weaknesses that allow fractures to crosscut the vein or reactivate either the vein or the interface (see chapter 4.1.2).Fractures in the DEM Model exhibit a higher degree of sinuosity and roughness than the straight, parallel veins in the conceptual model due to the intrinsic heterogeneity of the models and the structural dimension of the particle packing [ Hull , ]. A higher degree of interaction is therefore inevitable.The loading mechanism produces fractures with a characteristic spacing that results from the geometry of the setup as well as the ratio of tensile strength of the brittle layer and interface shear strength [ Schöpfer et al ., ]. Fractures have therefore a tendency to form in the same sequence at approximately the same position along the extension direction in each model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BPMs with smooth joints have been applied to study: confinement-dependent rock strength degradation in hard rock (Bahrani, Valley, Kaiser, & Pierce, 2011) and fracture spacing in layered rocks (Schöpfer, Arslan, Walsh, & Childs, 2011).…”
Section: Development and Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important aspects of understanding fracture networks, these properties include: mechanical layer thicknesses (e.g. Pollard & Aydin 1988;Wu & Pollard 1995;Schöpfer et al 2011); contrasts in physical properties at layer interfaces, especial in Young's modulus (e.g. He & Hutchinson 1989;Cooke et al 2006;Lézin et al 2009); and the bonded strength of interfaces between mechanical layers (e.g.…”
Section: An Integrated Interdisciplinary Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%