2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.02.151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling binding mechanisms of intrinsically disordered proteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
88
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A brief description of such a consensus mechanism from ref. 226 is provided (Fig. 18): the first step can be described as the non-specific reeling of the IDP by its target molecule via a "flycasting" mechanism.…”
Section: Variability Of Binding Modes Attainable By Disordered Proteimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A brief description of such a consensus mechanism from ref. 226 is provided (Fig. 18): the first step can be described as the non-specific reeling of the IDP by its target molecule via a "flycasting" mechanism.…”
Section: Variability Of Binding Modes Attainable By Disordered Proteimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The driving force of binding is provided by both the favorable intermolecular interaction energy and restriction of conformational entropy by binding conformationally restricted PSEs. 226 An excellent example studied by NMR and MD experiments is the pKID and CBP complex formation. 227,228 It is of note, however, that in some complexes the binding does not induce folding.…”
Section: Variability Of Binding Modes Attainable By Disordered Proteimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative idea was that binding of disordered regions depends on conformational selection from the structural ensemble [14] perhaps via "pre-formed elements" [15] that dominate the ensemble. Recently, it has been suggested that protein-protein interactions actually involve a combination of coupled binding and folding and conformational selection [16]. With regard to protein-protein interactions, papers have appeared recently that follow the structural transitions as these highly flexible regions associate with their partners [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another scenario, the "conformational selection" model, in which IDPs bind and fully fold through conformational selection following a two-state model, has been also proposed. [68][69][70] In the consensus synergistic model, 68 conformational selection has been proposed to play the most important role in the specific encounter, while coupled folding and binding has been suggested to be essential for the formation of the fully-bound complexes. Recently discovered functionally relevant binding of IDPs to unfolded and folded proteins without folding on the interacting partner [9][10][11]60 revealed a novel insight into IDP interactions, thus demonstrating the existence of two different modes of IDP binding to their protein partners: with and without folding (the "disorder-to-order" and "no disorder-to-order" scenarios).…”
Section: Receptor Signalingmentioning
confidence: 99%