2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.96.015801
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling Coulomb breakup and neutron radiative capture

Abstract: The Coulomb-breakup method to extract the cross section for neutron radiative capture at astrophysical energies is analyzed in detail. In particular, its sensitivity to the description of the neutron-core continuum is ascertained. We consider the case of 14 C(n, γ) 15 C for which both the radiative capture at low energy and the Coulomb breakup of 15 C into 14 C+n on Pb at 68 MeV/nucleon have been measured with accuracy. We confirm the direct proportionality of the cross section for both reactions to the square… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
11
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis hence independently confirms the value of the ANC extracted by Summers and Nunes from this same Coulombbreakup cross section [21]. The slightly larger ANC they have obtained (see line 4 of Table II ) is probably due to their use of a nonzero interaction in the p wave, which tends to reduce these contributions to the breakup [23,26,34]. Since there is no experimental observable upon which to constrain the phase shift in these partial waves, we have to rely on theoretical hypotheses.…”
Section: B Breakup Of 15 C On Lead At 68 Mev/nucleonsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our analysis hence independently confirms the value of the ANC extracted by Summers and Nunes from this same Coulombbreakup cross section [21]. The slightly larger ANC they have obtained (see line 4 of Table II ) is probably due to their use of a nonzero interaction in the p wave, which tends to reduce these contributions to the breakup [23,26,34]. Since there is no experimental observable upon which to constrain the phase shift in these partial waves, we have to rely on theoretical hypotheses.…”
Section: B Breakup Of 15 C On Lead At 68 Mev/nucleonsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This result confirms that this reaction is purely peripheral, in the sense that it is sensitive only to the tail of the projectile wave function and not to its interior. The excellent agreement with the data observed in this reaction observable suggests that the ANC we have extracted from the transfer data, combined with the choice of a nil interaction in the p 14 C-n partial waves, is valid structurewise [23]. Accordingly, the predictions of the ab initio calculations of Navrátil et al seem correct [39].…”
Section: A Breakup Of 15 C On Lead At 605 Mev/nucleonsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations