2021
DOI: 10.1038/s43016-021-00366-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconciling regional nitrogen boundaries with global food security

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the measures in the policy reform, enhancing SNUpE improvements is imperative to reducing N surplus and mitigating N pollution, which is in line with the conclusions of Chang et al (2021) and Gu et al (2017). Our estimate of N surplus reduction by increasing SNUpE in China is 19.4 Mt N in 2050, comparable with the global level estimated (58.0 Mt) by , when considering China's share of global synthetic fertilizer consumption and the initial SNUpE setting in our model.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studies and Uncertaintysupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the measures in the policy reform, enhancing SNUpE improvements is imperative to reducing N surplus and mitigating N pollution, which is in line with the conclusions of Chang et al (2021) and Gu et al (2017). Our estimate of N surplus reduction by increasing SNUpE in China is 19.4 Mt N in 2050, comparable with the global level estimated (58.0 Mt) by , when considering China's share of global synthetic fertilizer consumption and the initial SNUpE setting in our model.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studies and Uncertaintysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…2a). Our results show that with the current measures in the PAU scenario and further efforts in the AMB scenario, the nitrogen surplus can be kept well below the country's N planetary boundary-26 Mt (Chang et al 2021) (Fig. 5b), which indicates a safe operating boundary of human activities without damaging the functioning of resilience of the earth system, and is conducive to human welfare (Steffen et al 2015).…”
Section: Impacts On N Fertilizer Use N Surplus and N Pollutionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What is needed to improve crop production, environmental quality, and predictions in circular systems? The complexity of a new reality and the societal ambitions to apply principles of circular economies in agriculture from local to regional scales (see Chang et al, 2021, for an example of N management and global food security) demand rethinking of predictive plant breeding. Crop improvements that enable circularity in agriculture will require reimagining objectives that include not only higher productivity and stability but also lower environmental footprints, sequestration of carbon to combat climate change, improved efficiency of water use, improved nutrition and more equitable access to food, and reduced food waste (Paustian et al, 2016;Bailey-Serres et al, 2019;Bossio et al 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, through the analysis and summary of recent relevant literature, we found that scholars mainly focus on the hot issues including the utilization efficiency of chemical fertilizer (active nitrogen, etc. ), urbanization expansion, greenhouse effects, and pay more attention to the combination of economic, social and ecological benefits of agricultural production to reduce the threat of land use change to food security [ 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%