2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2015.01.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconfigurable distributed model predictive control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,15−18 It is because that it not only inherits the virtues of widely appreciated centralized Model Predictive Control (MPC), e.g., explicitly handling constraints, good optimization performance, etc., 19−23 but also has the advantages of distributed control, e.g., structural flexibility, good fault tolerance ability, etc. 8,15,17,18,24 Many DMPC methods have been proposed in the literature; DMPCs designed for addressing different types of problems. In refs 15, 18, and 27, the authors proposed a DMPC to address the problem of topological change in the existing control schemes.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,15−18 It is because that it not only inherits the virtues of widely appreciated centralized Model Predictive Control (MPC), e.g., explicitly handling constraints, good optimization performance, etc., 19−23 but also has the advantages of distributed control, e.g., structural flexibility, good fault tolerance ability, etc. 8,15,17,18,24 Many DMPC methods have been proposed in the literature; DMPCs designed for addressing different types of problems. In refs 15, 18, and 27, the authors proposed a DMPC to address the problem of topological change in the existing control schemes.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupling dynamics are taken into account in the form of time-varying terminal sets. In [12], by characterizing the local controller supply rates as linear functions of all possible network interconnection topologies, local controllers can reconfigure their local dissipativity properties to account for any known interconnection topology changes. In [13], the effect of subsystems joining or leaving the overall system is analyzed based on dissipativity property to give a reconfiguration strategy that ensures the overall stability during closed-loop operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the design of DMPC for nonlinear systems [15,16], DMPC for uncertain systems [15,17], DMPC for networked systems with time delay [18], a decentralized optimization algorithm for solving DMPC [19], the design of cooperative strategies for improving the performance of DMPC [20], the design of an event-based communication DMPC for reducing the load on the communication network [21], as well as the design of a DPMC control structure [22]. Among these algorithms, several DMPC algorithms relate to the purpose of improving the closed-loop optimization performance while considering the information connectivity [5,21,[23][24][25][26]. Information connectivity is considered because it directly affects the structural flexibility and error tolerance ability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is able to improve the flexibility and fault tolerance ability of the control network [37]. References [25,37] proposed reconfigurable DMPC and plug-and-play DMPC based on dissipative theory, which focus on the problem of how to design a DMPC which allows the addition or deletion of subsystems without any change in existing controllers. It can be seen that the optimization performance of the entire system and structural flexibility are two conflicting key points in DMPC design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%