2001
DOI: 10.1029/2000ja000444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconnection at the high‐latitude magnetopause during northward interplanetary magnetic field conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

27
208
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(236 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
27
208
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although previous studies have demonstrated that enhanced amounts of plasma enter to form a relatively thick, lowlatitude boundary layer 2,12,13 and a denser plasma sheet 13,14 when the IMF is northward even during quiet times, the dominant mechanism of solar wind entry into the magnetosphere (and entry location on the magnetopause) under these conditions is less clear and still controversial. It is still not very clearly understood whether the entering plasma is a result of the highlatitude MR 12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] , impulsive penetration 23,24 , or from the low latitudes through instabilities 25,26 or gradient drift 27 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous studies have demonstrated that enhanced amounts of plasma enter to form a relatively thick, lowlatitude boundary layer 2,12,13 and a denser plasma sheet 13,14 when the IMF is northward even during quiet times, the dominant mechanism of solar wind entry into the magnetosphere (and entry location on the magnetopause) under these conditions is less clear and still controversial. It is still not very clearly understood whether the entering plasma is a result of the highlatitude MR 12,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] , impulsive penetration 23,24 , or from the low latitudes through instabilities 25,26 or gradient drift 27 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While single-spacecraft measurements have provided ample in-situ evidence for the occurrence of reconnection at the MP (e.g. Paschmann et al, 1979Paschmann et al, , 1986Sonnerup et al, 1981;Gosling et al, 1991;Smith and Rodgers, 1991;Fuselier et al, 1991;Onsager et al, 2001;Avanov et al, 2001;Mozer et al, 2002), little is known about the large-scale spatial and temporal nature of reconnection from single-point in-situ observations. For example, it is not known whether reconnection at the MP is intrinsically intermittent or continuous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These observations often show a "reverse" cusp ion dispersion signature under northward IMF conditions, whereby the observed energy of precipitating magnetosheath-like ions in the cusp decreases with decreasing invariant latitude (Burch et al, 1980;Woch and Lundin, 1992;Matsuoka et al, 1996), in the opposite sense to that observed in the cusp during southward IMF conditions. This is a direct result of the energy dispersion of the particles during their time-of-flight, otherwise known as the velocity filter effect, resulting in particles precipitating at different latitudes as the newly-reconnected field lines convect sunward following reconnection (Onsager et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%