2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructed epidermis versus human and animal skin in skin absorption studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
79
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This will amount to a total number of about 30,000 substances. 1 In addition to that, the scientific committee on cosmetic products and nonfood products intended for consumers (SCCNFP)'s notes the high relevance of validation and evaluation of cosmetic products' effects. 2 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This will amount to a total number of about 30,000 substances. 1 In addition to that, the scientific committee on cosmetic products and nonfood products intended for consumers (SCCNFP)'s notes the high relevance of validation and evaluation of cosmetic products' effects. 2 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The in vitro approach that consists in the use of excised or reconstructed skin for validation tests (percutaneous absorption, toxicological risks, development of drugs, safety studies for cosmetic products) appears to be therefore inevitable. 1,5 This approach has been adopted by the ''guideline test'' 428 of the OECD (organization for economic co-operation and development). 6 The present sources for excised human skin are not sufficient to cover the need; therefore animal skin mainly from rat and pig are used instead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 This evidence significantly differed with respect to the data reported by some authors using adult pig skin, where an extended lag time was described. 10 The J max obtained by the present set of benzoxazinones were compared with the human skin permeability data 9 by means of the factor of difference value (FoD) described by Dick and Scott 11 (Equation 2):…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most of the cases, analyses showed an augmentation of the flux. One exception can be noted for Schreiber et al who observed no differences in the flux of caffeine and testosterone through porcine skin [23]. However, these analyses cannot be conclusive for human skin as it differs too greatly from animal skin.…”
Section: Volume 1 Issue 2 -2017mentioning
confidence: 96%