“…Although previous simulation of surface water DMS presented relative high R 2 , e.g., R 2 = 0.68~0.84 by using the MLD and Chl a [Simó and Dachs, 2002], R 2 = 0.676 by using the NCP [Kameyama et al, 2013], and R 2 = 0.63 by using SST, surface seawater nitrate and latitude [Watanabe et al, 2007], they were never tested in polar regions, such as SO SIZ. In addition, the comparison of seven different DMS climatologies, i.e., Kettle et al [1999], Kettle and Andreae [2000], Anderson et al [2001], Aumont et al [2002], Simó and Dachs [2002], Chu et al [2003], and Belviso et al [2004a], provided that the uncertainty in quantifying the global distritbuion of surface seawater DMS could up to 100% in the high latitudes [Belviso et al, 2004b].…”