2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructive pelvic surgery and plastic surgery: safety and efficacy of combined surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, operative times were not significantly greater than those in the group undergoing plastic surgery alone. 24 In contrast, Hardy et al showed a wound infection rate of 21.4 percent in morbidly obese women who underwent hysterectomy alone, and a 5.4 percent infection rate when this procedure was combined with panniculectomy. They also found that combined procedures reduced the incidence of intraoperative complications and postoperative wound complications without significantly increasing operative time or blood loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, operative times were not significantly greater than those in the group undergoing plastic surgery alone. 24 In contrast, Hardy et al showed a wound infection rate of 21.4 percent in morbidly obese women who underwent hysterectomy alone, and a 5.4 percent infection rate when this procedure was combined with panniculectomy. They also found that combined procedures reduced the incidence of intraoperative complications and postoperative wound complications without significantly increasing operative time or blood loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…7 Recently, Craig et al observed an increase in minor complications, operative times, and length of hospital stay when compared with the control group. 10 These findings led the authors to recommend caution and careful selection for patients undergoing such procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Some groups believe that the combined procedure results in increased complications, particularly in an increased incidence of pulmonary embolus [2][3][4]. One study discouraged ABP combined with cesarean delivery due to increased complications and unsatisfactory aesthetic outcomes [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, since it was first described in 1986, there has been ongoing debate regarding the outcomes and safety of the ABP-HYS. Certain groups have reported that the combined procedure resulted in increased complications, particularly in an increased incidence of pulmonary embolus [2][3][4][5]. More recently, others have indicated that ABP-HYS is safe and does not result in an increase in complication rates when compared to ABP and HYS on separate dates [1,[6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%