2005
DOI: 10.1002/9780470774656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstructive Plastic Surgical Nursing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Myofibroblasts are the principal cell type responsible for scar contraction (Li and Wang, 2011), and are derived from fibroblasts ∼2 weeks postwounding (Singer and Clark, 1999). PDGF and TGF-β stimulate this cellular differentiation and the resultant contractile force exerted by the myofibroblasts enables wound edges in humans to come together, at a rate of ∼0.75 mm a day (Figure 1) (Werner and Grose, 2003;Storch and Rice, 2005). Of course, in normal scars this wound contraction is an essential process; however, myofibroblasts typically go through apoptosis postepithelialization, thus halting contractive pathways (Desmoulière et al, 2005).…”
Section: Scar Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myofibroblasts are the principal cell type responsible for scar contraction (Li and Wang, 2011), and are derived from fibroblasts ∼2 weeks postwounding (Singer and Clark, 1999). PDGF and TGF-β stimulate this cellular differentiation and the resultant contractile force exerted by the myofibroblasts enables wound edges in humans to come together, at a rate of ∼0.75 mm a day (Figure 1) (Werner and Grose, 2003;Storch and Rice, 2005). Of course, in normal scars this wound contraction is an essential process; however, myofibroblasts typically go through apoptosis postepithelialization, thus halting contractive pathways (Desmoulière et al, 2005).…”
Section: Scar Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%