2011
DOI: 10.1029/2010jb007841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recoverable gas from hydrate-bearing sediments: Pore network model simulation and macroscale analyses

Abstract: 1] The volume of hydrate expands into a significantly larger volume of water and gas upon dissociation. Gas recovery and capillary-trapped residual gas saturation are investigated by simulating hydrate dissociation within pore networks. A fluid pressure-controlled boundary condition is used to determine the amount of recovered gas as a function of volume expansion; in this form, results are applicable to gas production by either thermal stimulation or depressurization when production rates prevent secondary hy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This overall fluid expansion at 8 MPa equates to 1880 L of CH 4 at 0.1 MPa. A detailed description of the pressure dependent fluid expansion effect across the phase boundary of CH 4 hydrate was presented by Jang and Santamarina in 2011 [11]. During these 12 h of the production test 288 L of CH 4 were catalytically converted to CO 2 and H 2 O.…”
Section: Figure 8 (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This overall fluid expansion at 8 MPa equates to 1880 L of CH 4 at 0.1 MPa. A detailed description of the pressure dependent fluid expansion effect across the phase boundary of CH 4 hydrate was presented by Jang and Santamarina in 2011 [11]. During these 12 h of the production test 288 L of CH 4 were catalytically converted to CO 2 and H 2 O.…”
Section: Figure 8 (A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.) core 8P) (Jang and Santamarina, 2011); (2) the residual water saturation S rw in this specimen is assumed to be the water content measured after complete depressurization of the specimen, which is 0.16; (3) the pressure dependent volume change of methane gas follows a modified PengeRobinson equation of state (Stryjek and Vera, 1986). Pressure and volume are inversely related, meaning the higher the pressure, the smaller the gas volume and higher the water saturation; and (4) the loss of gas within the sediments during the permeability measurement is neglected.…”
Section: Water Permeabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because a number of oceanic gas hydrate deposits are classified as low-permeability fine-grained sediments, e.g., Ulleung basin sediments as reported in Kwon et al [16], hydrate deposits in the Gulf of Mexico as reported in Francisca et al [17], and Krishna-Godavari basin in India as reported in Yun et al [18], the generation of excess pore pressure due to hydrate dissociation is known to be the most relevant process responsible for destabilizing hydrate-bearing sediments [10][11][12][13][14][15]. For example, a 1 °C increase in the temperature of hydrate-bearing sediments results in the pore fluid pressure increasing by the order of several megapascals under the no mass flux condition [15,19,20]. Therefore, any thermal change can stimulate hydrate dissociation and thus mechanically destabilize sediments [21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Gas Hydrate Dissociation As a Trigger Or Primer For Slope Famentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is presumed that water is the dominant phase that flows over gas because the scope of the present study is confined to low hydrate saturation and fine-grained sediments. When the hydrate saturation is greater than 40%, and consequently, the free gas released by hydrate dissociation percolates through pore throats, multiphase flow analyses are required [19,20].…”
Section: Hydrate Dissociation By Pressure Diffusionmentioning
confidence: 99%