2013
DOI: 10.1021/ja4083717
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovering a Representative Conformational Ensemble from Underdetermined Macromolecular Structural Data

Abstract: Structural analysis of proteins and nucleic acids is complicated by their inherent flexibility, conferred, for example, by linkers between their contiguous domains. Therefore, the macromolecule needs to be represented by an ensemble of conformations instead of a single conformation. Determining this ensemble is challenging because the experimental data are a convoluted average of contributions from multiple conformations. As the number of the ensemble degrees of freedom generally greatly exceeds the number of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
181
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
12
181
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We overcame the challenge of the resulting overfitting by computing ensembles of multi-state models that fit the data, using MultiFoXS (see Materials and Methods), and highlighting only the conserved features of these ensembles. Other similar approaches include EOM (62,63), MaxOcc (64)(65)(66)(67), ASTEROIDS (68)(69)(70), SES (71), and EROS (72). A parsimonious explanation of the SAXS profiles for each of the recPrP and recPrP-Fab-P samples is provided by the open and closed states, corresponding to the two R g peaks that were conserved for N-state models (for N ¼ 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We overcame the challenge of the resulting overfitting by computing ensembles of multi-state models that fit the data, using MultiFoXS (see Materials and Methods), and highlighting only the conserved features of these ensembles. Other similar approaches include EOM (62,63), MaxOcc (64)(65)(66)(67), ASTEROIDS (68)(69)(70), SES (71), and EROS (72). A parsimonious explanation of the SAXS profiles for each of the recPrP and recPrP-Fab-P samples is provided by the open and closed states, corresponding to the two R g peaks that were conserved for N-state models (for N ¼ 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This important issue has been widely studied, and a variety of methodologies has been developed by different groups (38)(39)(40)(41) to extract information (i.e., plausible conformational ensembles) from such conformationally averaged data (reviewed in ref. 42).…”
Section: −3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large number of experimental data from NMR on the geometry of unfolded polypeptide ensembles together with the knowledge on the covalent structure of the polypeptide chain provide powerful input for computer models of representative ensembles of the unfolded state. Typically, ensembles containing tens of thousands of conformers are simulated in an unrestrained manner and reduced by various methods (23)(24)(25)(26) to smaller-size ensembles that satisfy the measured parameters. As an alternative, we have recently used restrained ensemble structure calculations (27) to create minimal-size ensembles of urea-denatured ubiquitin (76 aa) that satisfy a very high number of 419 RDC and 253 PRE restraints obtained by NMR (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%