Recovering the counterfactual wage distribution with selective return migration

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SIZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author.IZA Discussion Paper No. 6795 August 2012 ABSTRACT Recovering the Counterfactual Wage Distribution with Selective Return MigrationThis paper explores the distribution of immigrant wages in the absence of return migration from the host country. In particular, it recovers the counterfactual wage distribution if all Mexican immigrants were to settle in the United States and no out-migration of Mexican-born workers occurred. Because migrants self-select in the decision to return, the overarching problem addressed by this study is the use of an estimator that accounts also for selection on unobservables. I adopt a semiparametric procedure that recovers this counterfactual distribution and find that Mexican returnees are middle-to high-wage earners at all levels of educational attainment. The presented results contrast with the general perception that those migrants who return home have failed in the host country.JEL Classification: J61, F22

Migrant Networks and the Spread of Information

“…If we used information from a single census round on migrants who have been in the US for a long time, we would not be able to reconstruct a migrant's network at the time of arrival. Moreover, as shown by Biavaschi () and Campos‐Vazquez and Lara (), selective out‐migration of more successful migrants would lead to an underestimation of the success of migrants. With the focus on recent migrants, we can only measure their short‐term success, although this enables us to obtain a more precise measure of their network, and base the estimation on a less selective sample.…”

Immigrants’ Wage Growth and Selective Out‐Migration

“…Borjas, 1985). Recent papers by Abramitzky, Boustan and Eriksson (2014) and Biavaschi (2016), try to circumvent the out-migration selectivity challenge by using repeated census data of both sending and host countries. 2 However, this is problematic if not all migrants (returnees) are identified in the host (sending) country census and different definitions of migrant/returnee or education are used in the sending and host country.…”

Selective Out-Migration and the Estimation of Immigrants’ Earnings Profiles

“…This same caveat applies to Venturini and Villosio (2008) and Faini, Strom, Venturini, and Villosio (2009), who use a similar framework for Italy. Biavaschi (2013), working with U.S. data, challenges the view that emigration is negatively selective. She formulates a selection model and then, using data from the 2000 U.S. and…”