1997
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.55.956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of a weakly magnetized negative-ion plasma after photodetachment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 We will show in the present article that the experimentally determined ratio I − / I e in typical volume sources with the magnetic filter extending to the plasma electrode is three to four orders of magnitude higher than the mentioned value. This leads, with T − = 0.2T e to I − / I e = 0.001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…8 We will show in the present article that the experimentally determined ratio I − / I e in typical volume sources with the magnetic filter extending to the plasma electrode is three to four orders of magnitude higher than the mentioned value. This leads, with T − = 0.2T e to I − / I e = 0.001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In order to "climb out" this barrier (∼k B T e if there were only electrons and positive ions) they should have enough energy, unless PG is biased at a potential close to the plasma potential. In fact, photodetachment measurements [47] effected near the PG of the source Camambert III showed that the H -gain a directed velocity towards the grid varying from 0.5 c s (very close to thermal velocity) at Φ PG =0 V up to 0.95 c s at Φ PG =4 V (the plasma potential in that experiment is lying between 2 to 3 V).…”
Section: Plasma Grid Bias Effectmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In nonmagnetized or weakly magnetized plasmas the decay rate corresponds to the refilling time of negative ions from the adjacent layer which is governed by the negative ion temperature. 25,26 However, at a probe position of 10 cm, the magnetic field is strong enough ͑B ϳ 0.005 T͒ over the probe length ͑as it cuts radial flux͒ to reduce the cross-field transport of electrons as they try to diffuse outward to regions of unperturbed plasma. Therefore, the photodetached region of the plasma along the beam remains electropositive over a greater time period.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%