1993
DOI: 10.1016/0720-048x(93)90071-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rectal carcinoid tumor: endoscopic ultrasonographic detection and endoscopic removal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported that only tumor size was an independent significant factor in assessment of the malignant nature of rectal carcinoid tumors with multivariate analysis, although the findings of tumor size ([10 mm), depth of invasion (muscularis propria or beyond), central depression or ulceration, mitotic index ([2/10 high power field, HPF), vascular invasion, and Ki-67 labeling index ([2%) were useful predictive criteria. Because the size and depth of rectal carcinoid tumors could not be detected with conventional endoscopy, EUS was performed to determine whether these tumors are indicated for endoscopic treatment and was found to be useful for assessing the size and the depth of rectal carcinoid tumors [15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that only tumor size was an independent significant factor in assessment of the malignant nature of rectal carcinoid tumors with multivariate analysis, although the findings of tumor size ([10 mm), depth of invasion (muscularis propria or beyond), central depression or ulceration, mitotic index ([2/10 high power field, HPF), vascular invasion, and Ki-67 labeling index ([2%) were useful predictive criteria. Because the size and depth of rectal carcinoid tumors could not be detected with conventional endoscopy, EUS was performed to determine whether these tumors are indicated for endoscopic treatment and was found to be useful for assessing the size and the depth of rectal carcinoid tumors [15][16][17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the patients with a tumour ≥ 2 cm in diameter, invasion of the muscularis propria was found in seven of the 12 patients not having metastasis and 52 of the 59 patients having metastasis at the time of resection. 7 In patients who underwent abdominoperineal resection, the 5-year survival rates were 100% among patients with a tumour < 2 cm in diameter, and 57% among patients with a tumour ≥ 2 cm in diameter. 5 Local resection, therefore, seems to be sufficient for small tumours, unless the tumours invade the muscle layer.…”
Section: Endoscopic Resection Of Carcinoid Tumoursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic polypectomy has a limited role in removing submucosal tumours. 7,10 Lifting the mucosal layer from the submucosa by injecting saline within the submucosa has made it feasible to remove sessile tumours by endoscopic snare electroexcision. Koyama et al 4 reported the usefulness of double snare polypectomy for the successful resection of small rectal carcinoid tumours.…”
Section: Endoscopic Resection Of Carcinoid Tumoursmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations