Rectificatory Justice

Roberts, Rodney C.

doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_375

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…If one thinks about justice for already existing animals, it is critical to use categories of rectificatory justice and duties of beneficence (Palmer 2011(Palmer , 2019. While distributive justice concerns the fair distribution of things, rectificatory justice deals with righting injustice and rectifying transactions where someone has been treated unfairly by another (Roberts 2011). Palmer illustrates it by an example of restoring freshwater wells for the return of cranes.…”

Section: Ethical Justification and Contradictions In Assisted Migration Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constructing regulation on assisted migration: findings from science and ethics

Lavrik

2021

SN Soc Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many scientists and environmentalists suggest using assisted migration (assisted colonization, managed relocation) as one of the responses to environmental degradation. Assisted migration (AM) is a translocation of animals and plants to the areas outside their native ranges suitable for them under the changing conditions. The international bodies, for example, the Secretariat to the Convention on Biological Diversity, recognize AM as a possible conservation tool. Some jurisdictions inserted it within their law and policy documents such as the 2019 Translocation Operational Policy in New South Wales, Australia. As climate changes, a need for AM can proliferate at national and international levels and further development of the regulation would be needed. However, the tool is a controversial one, for example, due to the risks for the translocating organisms and for the recipient communities, e.g., in case of possible invasiveness of the translocating animals and plants or changes in disease dynamics. This article seeks to summarize the law-and policy-relevant findings from science and ethics concerning AM that could help to construct the regulation that maximizes the benefits of using this tool and minimizes its risks.

show abstract

Section: Ethical Justification and Contradictions In Assisted Migration Issuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Constructing regulation on assisted migration: findings from science and ethics

Lavrik

2021

SN Soc Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Reconciling justice and attribution research to advance climate policy

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International audienceThe Paris Climate Agreement is an important step for international climate policy, but the compensation for negative effects of climate change based on clear assignment of responsibilities remains highly debated. From both a policy and a science perspective, it is unclear how responsibilities should be defined and on what evidence base. We explore different normative principles of justice relevant to climate change impacts, and ask how different forms of causal evidence of impacts drawn from detection and attribution research could inform policy approaches in accordance with justice considerations. We reveal a procedural injustice based on the imbalance of observations and knowledge of impacts between developed and developing countries. This type of injustice needs to be considered in policy negotiations and decisions, and efforts strengthened to reduce it

show abstract

Rectificatory Justice

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Constructing regulation on assisted migration: findings from science and ethics

Constructing regulation on assisted migration: findings from science and ethics

Reconciling justice and attribution research to advance climate policy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About