Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
L. Denoyelle, SPE, Inst. Fran<;:ais du Petrole C. Bardon, SPE, Inst. Fran<;:ais du Petrole E. Couve de Murville, SPE, Petrorep Summary. The Coulommes-Vaucourtois field operated by Petrorep and located in the Paris basin is near abandonment. During the 25-year production span, one-fourth of the original oil in place (OOlP) has been produced by a strong bottomwater drive. Reservoir engineering studies and laboratory measurements have shown that the reservoir characteristics were favorable for CO 2 injection.In 1983, an injection well was drilled between four existing production wells. During the spring and summer of 1984, 49 x 10 6 scf [1.4 x 10 6 std m 3 ] of CO 2 followed by 54 x 10 6 scf [1.5 x 10 6 std m 3 ] of N2 were injected. After 21/2 months of CO 2 injection, gas broke through into a well located far outside the pattern area. Shortly afterward, a producing well of the pattern showed a four-fold oil production increase as gas broke through. The three other wells exhibited smoother responses, with production of minute quantities of gas. Significant WOR decreases and oil production increases were observed. Gas analyses showed that the areal extent of the gas "bubble" was 15 to 20 times larger than the pattern area and that CO 2 and N2 did not spread in the same directions.This paper tries to match the test results with the geologic description, which shows the presence of fissures, and the production history of the reservoir, which exhibits a single-porosity behavior. It also stresses the difference between the incremental oil recovery resulting from the formation of an oil bank and that resulting from the gas-lift effect.
L. Denoyelle, SPE, Inst. Fran<;:ais du Petrole C. Bardon, SPE, Inst. Fran<;:ais du Petrole E. Couve de Murville, SPE, Petrorep Summary. The Coulommes-Vaucourtois field operated by Petrorep and located in the Paris basin is near abandonment. During the 25-year production span, one-fourth of the original oil in place (OOlP) has been produced by a strong bottomwater drive. Reservoir engineering studies and laboratory measurements have shown that the reservoir characteristics were favorable for CO 2 injection.In 1983, an injection well was drilled between four existing production wells. During the spring and summer of 1984, 49 x 10 6 scf [1.4 x 10 6 std m 3 ] of CO 2 followed by 54 x 10 6 scf [1.5 x 10 6 std m 3 ] of N2 were injected. After 21/2 months of CO 2 injection, gas broke through into a well located far outside the pattern area. Shortly afterward, a producing well of the pattern showed a four-fold oil production increase as gas broke through. The three other wells exhibited smoother responses, with production of minute quantities of gas. Significant WOR decreases and oil production increases were observed. Gas analyses showed that the areal extent of the gas "bubble" was 15 to 20 times larger than the pattern area and that CO 2 and N2 did not spread in the same directions.This paper tries to match the test results with the geologic description, which shows the presence of fissures, and the production history of the reservoir, which exhibits a single-porosity behavior. It also stresses the difference between the incremental oil recovery resulting from the formation of an oil bank and that resulting from the gas-lift effect.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.