2008
DOI: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31817f5cb9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrence of Group B Streptococci Colonization in Subsequent Pregnancy

Abstract: Women with GBS colonization are at increased risk of GBS colonization in a subsequent pregnancy. Prior GBS colonization should be considered in the algorithm to treat unknown GBS status during term labor.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among American women, rates of recurrent GBS colonization are reported between 40% and 53%, while among women who tested GBS negative in a prior pregnancy, GBS colonization is 15% to 19%. [10][11][12] Together with the present study, these results suggest that a 40% to 50% recurrent colonization risk is a reasonable estimate and also support the generalizability of our observations, in which cases were ascertained using unselected culture results from a single center. None of these reports, including the present study, allow differentiation between persistent colonization and new colonization, a distinction that would require molecular analysis not routinely performed in clinical labs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among American women, rates of recurrent GBS colonization are reported between 40% and 53%, while among women who tested GBS negative in a prior pregnancy, GBS colonization is 15% to 19%. [10][11][12] Together with the present study, these results suggest that a 40% to 50% recurrent colonization risk is a reasonable estimate and also support the generalizability of our observations, in which cases were ascertained using unselected culture results from a single center. None of these reports, including the present study, allow differentiation between persistent colonization and new colonization, a distinction that would require molecular analysis not routinely performed in clinical labs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Between 13% and 54% of women with an initial positive culture will no longer be colonized at the time of delivery. [5][6][7][8] Recurrent GBS colonization between pregnancies is reported at rates of 38% to 53%, [9][10][11][12] but a clear understanding of the factors influencing GBS colonization over time is lacking. We posited that if microbiological and clinical risk factors for colonization could be identified from an index pregnancy, an opportunity may exist to use this information in the management of a subsequent pregnancy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in view of the fact that in the surveyed group there were a considerable number of women aged over 30 years (about 33%), some of them could have given birth to children in the times when Streptococcus agalactiae disease prophylaxis was not commonly used. Cheng et al and Turrentine et al are of opinion that, if the phenomenon of GBS colonisation occurs in the first pregnancy, then its return in any subsequent pregnancy is highly probable [7,21]. Nonetheless, as the tests show, it is the primiparas that more frequently did a GBS test (86.4%) and were more aware that it was obligatory (13.6%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[25,26] Although some women with GBS colonisation during a pregnancy will be colonised during subsequent pregnancies, a substantial proportion will not. [27,28] The gastrointestinal tract serves as the primary reservoir for GBS and is the likely source of vaginal colonisation. Heavy colonisation, defi ned as culture of GBS from direct plating rather than from selective broth only, is associated with higher risk of early onset disease.…”
Section: Risk Factors For Eogbs Diseasementioning
confidence: 99%