2012
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.85.031916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent interactions in spiking networks with arbitrary topology

Abstract: The population activity of random networks of excitatory and inhibitory leaky integrate-and-fire neurons has been studied extensively. In particular, a state of asynchronous activity with low firing rates and low pairwise correlations emerges in sparsely connected networks. We apply linear response theory to evaluate the influence of detailed network structure on neuron dynamics. It turns out that pairwise correlations induced by direct and indirect network connections can be related to the matrix of direct li… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The topology of connections within a neural circuit molds emergent network dynamics (Buzsaki et al, 2004; Larremore et al, 2011; Ringach, 2009), especially in the absence of external inputs (Galan, 2008). In general, knowledge of network connectivity enables predictions about the correlational structure of the neural responses (Pernice et al, 2012; Trousdale et al, 2012), even though the converse is not true (Kispersky et al, 2011; Sporns, 2012; Trong and Rieke, 2008). Networks that exhibit approximate balance between excitation and inhibition are particularly straightforward in this respect because response correlations are shaped primarily by the first order connections between neurons rather than by higher order, polysynaptic chains of intrinsic connections (Trousdale et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topology of connections within a neural circuit molds emergent network dynamics (Buzsaki et al, 2004; Larremore et al, 2011; Ringach, 2009), especially in the absence of external inputs (Galan, 2008). In general, knowledge of network connectivity enables predictions about the correlational structure of the neural responses (Pernice et al, 2012; Trousdale et al, 2012), even though the converse is not true (Kispersky et al, 2011; Sporns, 2012; Trong and Rieke, 2008). Networks that exhibit approximate balance between excitation and inhibition are particularly straightforward in this respect because response correlations are shaped primarily by the first order connections between neurons rather than by higher order, polysynaptic chains of intrinsic connections (Trousdale et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies show that intrinsic neuronal dynamics (de la Rocha et al 2007;Litwin-Kumar et al 2011;Barreiro et al 2010;Hong et al 2012), reciprocal feedback inhibition (Ly et al 2012;Middleton et al 2012;Litwin-Kumar et al 2012;Tetzlaff et al 2012) and recurrent network dynamics (Hertz 2010;Renart et al 2010;Pernice et al 2011;Pernice et al 2012;Trousdale et al 2012) also act as decorrelating mechanisms. It is not immediately clear, however, how short-term synaptic depression and stochastic vesicle dynamics interact with recurrent network dynamics to determine correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlations in feed-forward networks of LIF models are studied in Moreno-Bote and Parga (2006), exact analytical solutions for such network architectures are given in Rosenbaum and Josic (2011) for the case of stochastic random walk models, and threshold crossing neuron models are considered in Tchumatchenko et al (2010) and Burak et al (2009). Covariances in structured networks are investigated for Hawkes processes (Pernice et al, 2011), and in linear approximation for LIF (Pernice et al, 2012) and exponential integrate-and-fire neurons (Trousdale et al, 2012). The latter three works employ an expansion of the propagator (time evolution operator) in terms of the order of interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%