2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b06101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recursive Gaussian Mixture Models for Adaptive Process Monitoring

Abstract: Gaussian mixture models (GMM) have recently been introduced and widely used for process monitoring. This paper intends to develop a new recursive GMM model for adaptive monitoring of processes under time-varying conditions. Two model updating schemes with/without forgetting factors are both proposed. Bayesian inference probability index is used as the monitoring statistic in both of the continuous and batch process monitoring models. In order to reduce the online computational complexity, an updating strategy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future directions will be devoted to the extension of the proposed approach to distributed and dynamic scenarios (e.g., pan-tilt or mobile cameras); in particular, incremental GMM approaches may be used to update and refine the SM in time ( [56]), while concepts of federated machine learning may be applied to distribute the computation over the network [57]. In addition, it is important to formally study the impact of the main setup parameters on the overall identification performance, as suggested by the results in Section 6.1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future directions will be devoted to the extension of the proposed approach to distributed and dynamic scenarios (e.g., pan-tilt or mobile cameras); in particular, incremental GMM approaches may be used to update and refine the SM in time ( [56]), while concepts of federated machine learning may be applied to distribute the computation over the network [57]. In addition, it is important to formally study the impact of the main setup parameters on the overall identification performance, as suggested by the results in Section 6.1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability density function (PDF) of the measurement errors is estimated to quantify the range of the measurement errors and to evaluate the uncertainty that is caused by the measurement errors. 37 Since the PDF of the measurement errors may not follow a Gaussian distribution, a Gaussian mixture model (GMM), 38,39 which can approximate a wide variety of PDFs, is used in this work. The PDF of the measurement errors of the jth variable is expressed as…”
Section: Data Types and Data Transformation Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability density function (PDF) of the measurement errors is estimated to quantify the range of the measurement errors and to evaluate the uncertainty that is caused by the measurement errors . Since the PDF of the measurement errors may not follow a Gaussian distribution, a Gaussian mixture model (GMM), , which can approximate a wide variety of PDFs, is used in this work. The PDF of the measurement errors of the j th variable is expressed as where M is the number of Gaussian components; ω m denotes the weight of the m th component and satisfies 0 ≤ ω m ≤ 1 and ; θ m = { μ m ,Σ m } consists of the mean μ m and the covariance Σ m and represents the density function parameter set; and p ( e j | θ m ) denotes the m thGaussian PDF, which is expressed as follows: As shown in Figure , the upper bound and the lower bound of the measurement error can be determined as the upper and lower quantiles, respectively, with respect to the significance α: where and refer to the upper bound and the lower bound, respectively, of the measurement error for the j th variable.…”
Section: Data Types and Data Transformation To Interval Formatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the numerical study, the proposed method is investigated by the typical nonlinear sinc function. Then the method is applied to estimate the particle size in a cobalt oxalate synthesis pilot (26) where N denotes the number of test samples, y n andŷ n denote the measured value and the predicted value by the soft sensor model respectively.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…JITL method is an alternative solution to deal with abrupt changes in process behaviors. Moreover, all the three updating strategies are combined with the traditional soft sensors, although a recursive GMM and a moving window GMM method were proposed in [26], [27] respectively. However, the two approaches were applied to process modeling and monitoring for dynamic multimode processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%