2011
DOI: 10.4103/0973-6247.76002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Red blood cell antibody screening in pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of 2060 mothers, history of blood transfusion was present in 14 (0.7%) women but none had alloantibodies. Prevalence of alloimmunization among pregnant women documented in various published studies [8][9][10][13][14][15][16] and the present study is shown in Table 6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Out of 2060 mothers, history of blood transfusion was present in 14 (0.7%) women but none had alloantibodies. Prevalence of alloimmunization among pregnant women documented in various published studies [8][9][10][13][14][15][16] and the present study is shown in Table 6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…These were identified as anti-D antibodies (n = 6, 66%), Anti-D with anti-C antibodies (n = 2, 22%), and anti-M antibody (n = 1, 11%). 9 In our study, we identified 3 (13.6%) antenatal women with a combination of anti D and anti C; out of which two caused a HDFN. Anti C alone is rare; usually it is associated with either anti D or anti E. 28 A statistically significant correlation has been reported between the rate of alloimmunization and adverse obstetric history and also with the gravid status of the women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…14 A prospective South Indian study carried out in 624 antenatal women gave a positive antibody screen in 9 cases (1.44%); anti-D-6 (0.96%), anti-D with anti-c-2 (0.32%) and anti-M-1 (0.16%). 15 A study conducted in same setting among 2469 D negative females showed a D-alloimmunisation of 3.12% and frequency of Rh-D HDFN was 2.28%. 16 Singhvi Arpita et al studied distribution of neonatal jaundice due to blood group incompatibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%