2018
DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redefining the Practical Utility of Blood Transcriptome Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Abstract: Background and Aims The study investigates the practical utility of whole-blood gene expression profiling to diagnose inflammatory bowel diseases [IBDs]. Methods The discovery cohorts included 102 and 51 paediatric IBD patients and controls, and 95 and 46 adult IBD patients and controls, respectively. The replication cohorts included 447 and 76 paediatric IBD patients and controls, and 271 and 108 adult IBD patients and controls, respectively. In the discovery phase, RN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we analysed an AmpliSeq study (PRJEB28822) in the whole peripheral blood of IBD patients [ 21 ]. APP expression was significantly reduced in pediatric IBD patients compared with HC (FC = −0.54, p < 0.001), while ELAVL1 was significantly elevated (FC = 0.15, p < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we analysed an AmpliSeq study (PRJEB28822) in the whole peripheral blood of IBD patients [ 21 ]. APP expression was significantly reduced in pediatric IBD patients compared with HC (FC = −0.54, p < 0.001), while ELAVL1 was significantly elevated (FC = 0.15, p < 0.05).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in mapping disease activity, identification of early disease, and therapy-related molecular markers have been made possible by the widespread methodology of bulk RNA-seq, a robust and nowadays inexpensive method of sequencing the transcriptome. Despite the effort, the current number of direct applications of molecular-based disease diagnostic and treatment remains limited (39). One explanation for the poor output of bulk RNA-seq-driven methods is that it solely depicts the transcriptome of a homogeneous and unidentifiable agglomerate of different cell types.…”
Section: Rna Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to compare our mouse data with data from UC patients, we obtained and processed data from 8 different publicly available studies. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] A set of SDE genes in colon and blood was obtained by combining the different datasets, requiring each gene to be consistently SDE (padj≤0.05) in at least two datasets. For the small RNA-Seq we only used two datasets and required that each miRNA is SDE (padj≤0.05) in at least one of these datasets.…”
Section: Comparison Between Mouse and Human Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain reliable sets of SDE genes in human UC and to compare them with mouse in both colon and blood, we identified integrated sets of SDE genes using several public human datasets. For colon, 2 RNA-Seq 18 and 2 microarray studies 19,20 and for blood, 2 RNA-Seq studies 16,17 were used ( Table 2, Supplementary File 8). Human miRNA data for colon was obtained by combining one RNA-Seq and one microarray dataset.…”
Section: Colon and Blood Transcriptomics Signature Of Human Ucmentioning
confidence: 99%