2000
DOI: 10.2307/40184277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redes sociales y variación sociolingüística

Abstract: Los primeros estudios sociolingüísticos en los que se utiliza el concepto de red social vieron la luz en la década de los ochenta. Desde entonces, el interés por el análisis reticular ha ido en aumento. En nuestro país son todavía pocas las investigaciones llevadas a cabo desde esta perspectiva, pero las realizadas demuestran la eficacia de este concepto como factor de variación sociolingüística. Así se puede ver en el estudio sobre el habla de Alcalá de Henares, en el que la red social ha resultado ser una va… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data for calculating characteristics of the social network of first-generation speakers (5 items): Sociolinguistic studies put forward that the structure of the social network may deeply condition language uses. Dense social networks usually determine more uniform language practices, while loose (or diffuse) social networks imply non-homogeneous language practices (Blanco Canales 2000). For HL transmission in particular, dense social networks were argued to be responsible for better HL acquisition (see Shively 2018 for an overview).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data for calculating characteristics of the social network of first-generation speakers (5 items): Sociolinguistic studies put forward that the structure of the social network may deeply condition language uses. Dense social networks usually determine more uniform language practices, while loose (or diffuse) social networks imply non-homogeneous language practices (Blanco Canales 2000). For HL transmission in particular, dense social networks were argued to be responsible for better HL acquisition (see Shively 2018 for an overview).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%