2013
DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2013.42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rediscovery of Glauconycteris superba Hayman, 1939 (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) after 40 years at Mbiye Island, Democratic Republic of the Congo

Abstract: We report the rediscovery of the pied butterfly bat, Glauconycteris superba Hayman, 1939, 40 years after this species was last recorded. The new specimen from Mbiye Island, Democratic Republic of the Congo, is compared with the type specimens of G. s. superba and G. superba sheila Hayman, 1947 and a specimen from Matonguiné, Ivory Coast. The variation in the striking colouration of the pelage as well as in morphometric data is considered to be individual rather than geographic variation and we tentatively rega… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The morphological traits and their abbreviations are as follows: body weight (W, expressed in g); whole body length (HBL); tail length (TL); forearm length (FA); hind foot length, including claws (HF); tibia length (TIB); ear length (EAR); tragus length (TRA); third finger metacarp (3FM); third finger phalange (3FPH1); forth finger metacarp (4FM); forth finger phalange (4FPH1); fifth finger metacarp (5FM); fifth finger phalange (5FPH1); greatest length of skull, excluding incisors (GLS); condylo-basal length (CBL); condylo-canine length (CCL); palatal length (PL); maxillary toothrow length (CM 3 ); width across the upper molars (M 3 M 3 ); width across the upper canines (C 1 C 1 ); zygomatic breadth (ZB); greatest braincase width (GBW); greatest mandible length excluding incisors (MAND); postorbital width (POB); rostrum width (RW); maxillary toothrow length (CM 3 ); distance from the 3rd upper molar to the upper incisor (IM 3 ); mandibular toothrow length (CM 3 ), lower dental raw (IM 3 ); upper molar series (molars + premolar; SPM). More detailed definitions of these measurements are found in Ruedi et al (2012) and Tungaluna et al (2013) . Dentition morphology was studied in detail and the teeth for each individual were carefully measured with a Zeiss 2 stereo microscope under 1.6× to 6× magnifications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The morphological traits and their abbreviations are as follows: body weight (W, expressed in g); whole body length (HBL); tail length (TL); forearm length (FA); hind foot length, including claws (HF); tibia length (TIB); ear length (EAR); tragus length (TRA); third finger metacarp (3FM); third finger phalange (3FPH1); forth finger metacarp (4FM); forth finger phalange (4FPH1); fifth finger metacarp (5FM); fifth finger phalange (5FPH1); greatest length of skull, excluding incisors (GLS); condylo-basal length (CBL); condylo-canine length (CCL); palatal length (PL); maxillary toothrow length (CM 3 ); width across the upper molars (M 3 M 3 ); width across the upper canines (C 1 C 1 ); zygomatic breadth (ZB); greatest braincase width (GBW); greatest mandible length excluding incisors (MAND); postorbital width (POB); rostrum width (RW); maxillary toothrow length (CM 3 ); distance from the 3rd upper molar to the upper incisor (IM 3 ); mandibular toothrow length (CM 3 ), lower dental raw (IM 3 ); upper molar series (molars + premolar; SPM). More detailed definitions of these measurements are found in Ruedi et al (2012) and Tungaluna et al (2013) . Dentition morphology was studied in detail and the teeth for each individual were carefully measured with a Zeiss 2 stereo microscope under 1.6× to 6× magnifications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%