Redistributing Wealth to Families

Legendre, François; Lorgnet, Jean-Paul; Thibault, Florence

doi:10.1177/0193841x05279180

Cited by 2 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…29. Which is consistent with previous studies conducted in this period: Laroque and Salanié (1999and Legendre et al (2003 for 2000 find a U-shaped EMTR distribution, whereas Bourguignon (1998) ➔ with the positive marginal rates of the PPE in its degressive phase (see Online complement C4, Figure C4-II). 30 For the EPTR, the findings are different.…”

Section: Changes In Emtr and Eptr Between 1998 2008 And 2014supporting

confidence: 92%

“…He found that the EMTR curve had a flattened U shape, but with peaks at certain deciles. Laroque and Salanié (1999), and Legendre et al (2003) calculated EMTR at the end of the 1990s and obtained similar findings to Bourguignon (a more-or-less U-shaped curve), but they also calculated return-to-work incentive indicators. 8 Chanchole and Lalanne (2012) gave an overview of EMTR in 2009, calculated on the basis of net earned income and replacement and capital income, but not taking into account social contributions.…”

Section: See the Literature Review Bymentioning

confidence: 54%

“…who return to work can be found for France in the studies by Legendre et al (2003), Laroque and Salanié (1999), Gurgand and Margolis (2008), or compared internationally with reprensentative tax profiles in the study by the OECD (2017). 20.…”

Section: A Description By Microsimulation Of the Financial Gains For mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In France, previous studies have analyzed work incentives either at the intensive margin (Bourguignon, 1998;Chanchole & Lalanne, 2012;Fourcot & Sicsic, 2017) or at the extensive margin (Legendre et al, 2003;Gurgand & Margolis, 2008). Both margins are analyzed in Laroque and Salanié (1999), in Immervoll et al (2007) who carry out a comparative analysis of monetary incentives to work in 15 EU countries and more recently in Sicsic (2018) who studies the evolution of monetary incentives to work in France over time by household composition.…”

Section: Analyzing Monetary Incentives To Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…At the extensive margin, Legendre et al (2003) and Gurgand and Margolis (2008) estimate the monetary gains to work of unemployed or inactive individuals using individual characteristics such as education or work experience to simulate plausible transitions to work. They conclude that agents have on average very little incentives to take a job (if any), calling for the move towards make-work-pay policies in France that has been recently observed.…”

Section: Housing Benefits and Monetary Incentives To Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Housing Benefits and Monetary Incentives to Work: Simulations for France

Ferey¹

2019

Ecostat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The opinions and analyses in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect their institution's or Insee's views. 1. The statistical department of the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. EMTR Disposable income Gross income Disposable income Disposable income: after rebate on CSG if gross income below 1.3 times minimum wage Disposable income: after abolition of housing benefit Effective marginal tax rate Effective marginal tax rate: after rebate on CSG if gross income below 1.3 times minimum wage Effective marginal tax rate: after abolition of housing benefit

show abstract

Section: Changes In Emtr and Eptr Between 1998 2008 And 2014supporting

confidence: 92%

Section: See the Literature Review Bymentioning

confidence: 54%

Section: A Description By Microsimulation Of the Financial Gains For mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Analyzing Monetary Incentives To Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Housing Benefits and Monetary Incentives To Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Housing Benefits and Monetary Incentives to Work: Simulations for France

Ferey¹

2019

Ecostat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Artificial Intelligence, Growth and Employment: The Role of Policy

Aghion¹,

Antonin²,

Bunel³

2019

Ecostat

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Alongside this, quality standards have improved. Originally, publication was only subject to internal approval from above. Today, the manuscripts submitted are systematically assessed by anonymous reviewers as part of a standard peer review system. And the journal, like any academic journal, now has a formal governance structure with a Scientific Committee since 2003 and an Editorial Advisory Board since 2014.As a natural corollary of these changes, the papers published in the journal do not necessarily reflect the views of Insee. Indeed, the readers are systematically reminded that "the views and opinions expressed by the authors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the institutions to which they belong or of Insee itself." This precaution is not always sufficient, and when there is a debate over a paper, it is often presented as "an Insee study". From my point of view as a publishing director, I find the confusion regrettable, although it does not, and indeed should not, cause us to avoid a subject or reject a paper on the grounds that it might generate controversy. In practice, informing debates cannot always be done by staying out of the debate.The editors have always been, and remain, committed to facilitating access to articles, in particular with the use of "boxes". While these were initially intended to accommodate the most technical developments so that they do not interfere with the ease of reading, they now contribute to a rigorous presentation of the sources used and their possible treatment. I am aware that this is not standard practice in academic journals, but I will nonetheless continue to defend the original model -an extremely useful model in my view -of a journal that sets high standards while at the same time striving to remain accessible to readers who may not necessarily be experts in the topics discussed.In very recent years, the journal has continued to evolve with the aim of achieving greater international openness. This is precisely why Économie et Statistique has become "Economie et Statistique/Economics and Statistics", published simultaneously in French and English, and both available on the Insee website. However, the journal has remained faithful to the same key principles, including openness to different topics and disciplines and a dual commitment to official statistics and research, which give it a distinctive place both at Insee and within the field of French journals.While I very much hope that this anniversary will be followed by many more, I would also like to thank the editors-in-chief we have had since 1969, the academics who have agreed to sit on the Scientific Committee over the past fifteen years, and all the reviewers working anonymously behind the scenes.

show abstract

Redistributing Wealth to Families

Cited by 2 publications

References 5 publications

Housing Benefits and Monetary Incentives to Work: Simulations for France

Housing Benefits and Monetary Incentives to Work: Simulations for France

Artificial Intelligence, Growth and Employment: The Role of Policy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About