Redistributive effects of CAP liberalisation: From the sectoral level to the single farm

Депперманн, Андре; Offermann, Frank; Grethe, Harald

doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.11.002

Cited by 21 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…That rather simplistic approach based on relative changes is often applied in studies combining macro‐ and micro‐simulation ( cf . Bourguignon et al ., for use in macro‐micro simulations for general or Deppermann et al ., for an application to single farms). Resulting changes in labour and capital costs at micro level reflect simulated changes in production output level and cost shares relative to the originally estimated labour and capital costs of each single farm.…”

Section: Overview On the Agrispace Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysing Farm‐specific Payments for Norway using the Agrispace Model

Mittenzwei¹,

Britz²

2018

J Agricultural Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Norway maintains a complex system of activity or type specific coupled payments which account for a large share of farm income. Most of the payment rates are negatively related to farm size and are higher in remote areas compared to central regions. We present and use a newly developed recursive-dynamic multi-commodity model (Agrispace) with CES production functions depicting regional farm clusters derived from the full farm population. Using this model, we simulate impacts of current and alternative subsidy policies on production, prices, input use, income and farm structural change. Mapping cluster results to each farm along with behavioural rules allows estimation of individual profits and farm exits. Our results indicate that, in the short run, the current policy regime seems to support the policy objective of maintaining a variety of farms in all parts of Norway. In the long run, farm structural change is less affected by a policy reform that leaves total support levels unchanged.

show abstract

Section: Overview On the Agrispace Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysing Farm‐specific Payments for Norway using the Agrispace Model

Mittenzwei¹,

Britz²

2018

J Agricultural Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…To tackle the issue of disproportional incomes, a more targeted payment system should be called for. Deppermann et al (2016) took a different approach. The authors used an ex-ante policy model to analyse the redistributive effects of CAP liberalisation.…”

Section: Internal Convergencementioning

confidence: 99%

economic impacts of direct payments on agricultural income – A Literature Review

Szerletics

Jámbor

2021

competitio

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The economic impacts of direct payments is a widely studied field in the literature related to the Common Agricultural Policy. This article aims to provide a systematic review of the income-related impacts of direct payments. In doing so, the article screened the academic literature on the impacts of direct payments and identified 150 relevant ones, out of which 41 were written directly on income-related effects.Relevant articles can be classified into four groups: general, distributional, stabilisation and other impacts. Most of the literature criticised the ongoing system of direct payments and their effectiveness in producing income-related policy goals. We believe that our results can be useful for researchers and policymakers in better understanding the income-related impacts of direct payments. Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) classification: Q18

show abstract

“…Thus, rather than stimulating higher agricultural productivity, the current challenge is to balance productivity with other objectives (Tangermann 2011). On the other hand, uneven distribution of Direct Payments (DPs) among farm size classes as well as among MSs suggests that the CAP instruments in general, and DPs in particular, have failed to reduce disparities and achieve a fair standard of living, and are inefficient in meeting farmers' needs (Deppermann et al 2016). The chosen instruments do not sufficiently contribute to the targets.…”

Section: Reforming Cap Targets Vs Maintaining 'Old' Cap Structurementioning

confidence: 99%

Transitioning to Sustainable Life on Land

Azadi

Moghaddam²,

Mahmoudi³

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

His research focuses on the economics and governance of sustainable land use and nature conservation, within and between agriculture, forestry, builtup land, natural areas, as well as wetlands and inland water bodies. He is the leader of many national and international research projects. He has published extensively in leading journals in the field, such as Land Use Policy, Ecological Economics, Ecology and Society, International Journal of the Commons, Sustainability, and Water, among others. He serves as an Editorial Board Member of MDPI journals, Resources and Land, and chairs the Sustainability Commission of the University of Greifswald.

show abstract

Redistributive effects of CAP liberalisation: From the sectoral level to the single farm

Abstract: Abstract. There is a growing public and political interest in effects of

Cited by 21 publications

References 31 publications

Analysing Farm‐specific Payments for Norway using the Agrispace Model

Analysing Farm‐specific Payments for Norway using the Agrispace Model

economic impacts of direct payments on agricultural income – A Literature Review

Transitioning to Sustainable Life on Land

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About