Redox 2000
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-04080-5_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Redox Fronts in Aquifer Systems and Parameters Controlling their Dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we propose that residual brackish water trapped in the clay-rich layer has undergone BSR resulting in very high δ 34 S sulfate values for the remaining sulfate. These δ 34 S sulfate values are comparable or higher compared to those reported for BSR in other groundwater environments (e.g., Schüring et al, 2000;Dogramaci et al, 2001). In general, the sulfur isotopic fractionation during BSR (Δ 34 S = δ 34 S sulfate − δ 34 S sulfide ) decreases as the cell-specific rate of sulfate reduction increases (Fritz et al, 1989;Canfield, 2001a;Stam et al, 2006).…”
Section: Calculation Of Sulfur Isotope Enrichment Factors For Bsrsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, we propose that residual brackish water trapped in the clay-rich layer has undergone BSR resulting in very high δ 34 S sulfate values for the remaining sulfate. These δ 34 S sulfate values are comparable or higher compared to those reported for BSR in other groundwater environments (e.g., Schüring et al, 2000;Dogramaci et al, 2001). In general, the sulfur isotopic fractionation during BSR (Δ 34 S = δ 34 S sulfate − δ 34 S sulfide ) decreases as the cell-specific rate of sulfate reduction increases (Fritz et al, 1989;Canfield, 2001a;Stam et al, 2006).…”
Section: Calculation Of Sulfur Isotope Enrichment Factors For Bsrsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Therefore, a detailed understanding of the development of redox zoning in aquifers is crucial for sustainable management of groundwater quality. Reduction processes in groundwater generally succeed one another in the order of decreasing free energy yield, beginning with the reduction of oxygen, followed by reduction of NO 3 − , Mn(IV), Fe(III), SO 4 2− and CO 2 (Froelich et al, 1979;Berner, 1981;Schüring et al, 2000). Among these processes, BSR and methanogenesis can occur only in a very reducing environment with sufficient organic carbon (Stumm and Morgan, 1981;Chapelle et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In soil chemistry, for example, the redox potential value can estimate whether the soil is aerobic or anaerobic, and whether chemical compounds such as Fe oxides or nitrate have been chemically reduced or are present in their oxidised form. In natural waters, redox reactions include the oxidation of organic matter and various reduction reactions such as the reduction of oxygen to water, nitrate to elementary nitrogen dioxide, iron (III) to Fe (II), sulphate to sulphide, and carbon dioxide to methane [ 6 ]. In terms of nanomaterial toxicity, redox potential is a parameter that has been associated with inducing oxidative stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Redox potential is a measure of a system's affinity for electrons, and the measurement of redox potential will only have meaning when there are reduced and oxidised species, called the redox couple, in the liquid media. The redox couple undergoes a redox reaction, in which the reduction (gain of electrons) of one redox species is accompanied by the oxidation (loss of electrons) of another [ 6 ]. The movement of electrons, governed by kinetics (e.g., transport limitations of the redox species to the electrode), creates an electric potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, groundwater velocity, capillary fringes, and redox gradients might cause a vertical heterogeneity within an aquifer (Spalding and Exner, ). For example, in humid regions under natural conditions, the concentrations of redox‐sensitive substances, such as phosphate and iron, decrease with sediment depths (Schüring et al ., ), whereas more conservative substances increase because of leaching processes in the upper soil. In comparison to the often observed spatial heterogeneity, the temporal variance of the groundwater composition is usually small (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%