A series of coinage metal complexes containing the redox-active metalloligands [RuCp X (κ 3 N-Tpmd)] {κ 3 N-Tpmd = κ 3 N-[C(pz) 3 ] with pz = pyrazolyl; [RuCp(Tpmd)] (2a) and [RuCp*(Tpmd)] (2b)} are presented. 2a and 2b are isolable, relatively stable compounds, despite the fact that they feature a "naked" carbanion at the bridgehead position of the κ 3 N-coordinated tris(pyrazolyl)methanide ligand scaffold. As expected, both complexes act as κ 1 C ligands toward coinage metal fragments to yield dinuclear complexes of the general formulaAll complexes under study were fully characterized by common spectroscopic techniques; the structural parameters of 2a, 3a, 5a, 6a, 7a, and 10a were determined by X-ray diffraction. Coordination of the {MX} fragment leads to electronic effects on the metalloligand unit, as reflected by the corresponding 1 H and 13 C NMR spectra. Density functional theory calculations were performed in order to elucidate a conceivable interplay between the metal atoms. The bonding characteristics within the {MX} fragment are only marginally affected upon electronic excitation of the ruthenium-based metalloligand. However, some effect of the influence of {MX} on the E 0 1/2 (Ru II /Ru III ) value was detected with the aid of cyclic voltammetry measurements. A strong Lewis-acidic metal fragment such as GaCl 3 (11a) leads to an E 0 1/2 value of 0.37 V, while electron-richer coinage metal fragments facilitate the oxidation of the ruthenium center significantly (E 0 1/2 = 0.14−0.23 V). This dependence suggests an interaction between both metals due to their close spatial proximity.